Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Germany.
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Aug;84(2):251-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
In Germany, approximately 10 million women between the ages of 50 and 69 are eligible for biennial mammography screening. Mammography is at the center of much controversy, however, which means gynecologists must provide women considering mammography with sufficient and transparent information. The present study analyzed the information gynecologists share with a person seeking advice about the benefit and harms of mammography screening.
To receive realistic data, we called 20 gynecologists practicing in different large cities across Germany and took telephone counseling sessions on the benefit and harms of mammography.
The majority of gynecologists described mammography as safe and scientifically well grounded. Harms were rarely mentioned or described as negligible. A minority of gynecologists provided numerical information; when they did, they often quantified the benefit using relative risk reduction and harms using absolute risk increase.
A sample of German gynecologists was not able to correctly and transparently communicate the benefit and harms of mammography screening to a patient.
Gynecologists should be taught how to understand and transparently explain medical risk information in simple terms.
在德国,50 至 69 岁的约 1000 万名女性有资格进行每两年一次的乳房 X 光筛查。然而,乳房 X 光检查存在很多争议,这意味着妇科医生必须向考虑进行乳房 X 光检查的女性提供充分和透明的信息。本研究分析了妇科医生向寻求乳房 X 光筛查益处和危害信息的人提供的信息。
为了获得真实的数据,我们随机挑选了 20 名在德国不同大城市执业的妇科医生,并就乳房 X 光检查的益处和危害进行了电话咨询。
大多数妇科医生将乳房 X 光检查描述为安全且有充分科学依据的。危害很少被提及,或被描述为微不足道。少数妇科医生提供了数值信息;当他们这样做时,他们通常使用相对风险降低来量化益处,使用绝对风险增加来量化危害。
德国的妇科医生样本无法向患者正确和透明地传达乳房 X 光筛查的益处和危害。
应教授妇科医生如何理解并以简单明了的方式透明地解释医学风险信息。