• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康素养有限的患者和医务人员对乳腺 X 线摄影潜在获益和危害的讨论:“噢,还有危害?”

Discussions of Potential Mammography Benefits and Harms among Patients with Limited Health Literacy and Providers: "Oh, There are Harms?".

机构信息

Women's Health Interdisciplinary Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Health Commun. 2020 Dec 1;25(12):951-961. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1845256. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1080/10810730.2020.1845256
PMID:33455518
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8062298/
Abstract

Starting breast cancer screening at age 40 versus 50 may increase potential harms frequency with a small mortality benefit. Younger women's screening decisions, therefore, may be complex. Shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended for women under 50 and may support women under 55 for whom guidelines vary. How women with limited health literacy (LHL) approach breast cancer screening decision-making is less understood, and most SDM tools are not designed with their input. This phenomenological study sought to characterize mammography counseling experiences among women with LHL and primary care providers (PCPs). Women ages 40-54 with LHL who had no history of breast cancer or mammogram within 9 months were approached before a primary care visit at a safety-net hospital. PCPs at this site were invited to participate. Qualitative interviews explored mammography counseling experiences. Patients also reviewed sample information materials. A constant comparison technique generated four themes salient to 25 patients and 20 PCPs: addressing family history versus comprehensive risk assessment; potential mammography harms discussions; information delivery preferences; and integrating pre-visit information tools. Findings suggest that current counseling techniques may not be responsive to patient-identified needs. Opportunities exist to improve how mammography information is shared and increase accessibility across the health literacy spectrum.

摘要

从 40 岁开始进行乳腺癌筛查与从 50 岁开始相比,可能会增加潜在危害的发生频率,但死亡率获益较小。因此,年龄较轻的女性的筛查决策可能较为复杂。建议对 50 岁以下的女性进行共同决策(SDM),并且可能会支持指南有所不同的 55 岁以下的女性。对于健康素养有限(LHL)的女性如何进行乳腺癌筛查决策的了解较少,并且大多数 SDM 工具并非基于其输入而设计。这项现象学研究旨在描述 LHL 女性和初级保健提供者(PCP)的乳房 X 光检查咨询体验。在一家安全网医院的初级保健就诊之前,邀请了无乳腺癌病史或在 9 个月内未进行乳房 X 光检查的年龄在 40-54 岁之间且健康素养有限的女性参加。邀请了该地点的 PCP 参与。定性访谈探讨了乳房 X 光检查咨询的经验。患者还审查了示例信息材料。恒定比较技术生成了 25 名患者和 20 名 PCP 共有的四个主题:家族史与综合风险评估;潜在的乳房 X 光危害讨论;信息传递偏好;以及整合就诊前信息工具。研究结果表明,目前的咨询技术可能无法满足患者确定的需求。有机会改善乳房 X 光信息的共享方式,并提高整个健康素养范围内的可及性。

相似文献

1
Discussions of Potential Mammography Benefits and Harms among Patients with Limited Health Literacy and Providers: "Oh, There are Harms?".健康素养有限的患者和医务人员对乳腺 X 线摄影潜在获益和危害的讨论:“噢,还有危害?”
J Health Commun. 2020 Dec 1;25(12):951-961. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1845256. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
2
Engaging Women with Limited Health Literacy in Mammography Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients and Primary Care Providers.参与健康素养有限的女性进行乳房 X 光检查决策:患者和初级保健提供者的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):938-945. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06213-2. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Using Mixed Methods With Multiple Stakeholders to Inform Development of a Breast Cancer Screening Decision Aid for Women With Limited Health Literacy.采用混合方法并与多个利益相关者合作,为健康素养有限的女性开发乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具提供信息。
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jul 20;6(2):23814683211033249. doi: 10.1177/23814683211033249. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
4
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.乳腺 X 线摄影共享决策的关键要素:文献的范围综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
5
Modifying a Mammography Decision Aid for Older Adult Women with Risk Factors for Low Health Literacy.为有低健康素养风险因素的老年成年女性修改乳腺 X 线摄影决策辅助工具。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2021 Apr;5(2):e78-e90. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20210308-01. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
6
Core Elements of Shared Decision-making for Women Considering Breast Cancer Screening: Results of a Modified Delphi Survey.考虑乳腺癌筛查的女性共同决策的核心要素:改良德尔菲调查结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1668-1677. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05298-8. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
7
Evaluation of a mammography decision aid for women 75 and older at risk for lower health literacy in a pretest-posttest trial.评估在一项预试验后试验中针对健康素养较低的 75 岁及以上有风险的女性使用的乳腺 X 线摄影决策辅助工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2344-2350. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.020. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
8
Primary Care Providers' Beliefs and Recommendations and Use of Screening Mammography by their Patients.初级保健提供者的信念、建议及其患者对乳腺钼靶筛查的使用情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):449-457. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3973-y. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
9
Comparative effectiveness of audit-feedback versus additional physician communication training to improve cancer screening for patients with limited health literacy.审计反馈与额外的医生沟通培训对改善健康素养有限患者癌症筛查的比较效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug;29(8):1113-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2782-4. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
10
Are Providers Prepared to Engage Younger Women in Shared Decision-Making for Mammography?医务人员是否准备好让年轻女性参与乳腺癌 X 光筛查的共同决策?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;27(1):24-31. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6047. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Education level is associated with the occurrence and timing of hysterectomy: A cohort study of Canadian women.教育水平与子宫切除术的发生和时间有关:加拿大女性的队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Nov;103(11):2211-2220. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14959. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
2
Mixed-Method Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Shared Decision-Making Tools for Cancer Screening.癌症筛查共同决策工具的混合方法系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 29;15(15):3867. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153867.
3
Poor health literacy associated with stronger perceived barriers to breast cancer screening and overestimated breast cancer risk.

本文引用的文献

1
Engaging Women with Limited Health Literacy in Mammography Decision-Making: Perspectives of Patients and Primary Care Providers.参与健康素养有限的女性进行乳房 X 光检查决策:患者和初级保健提供者的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):938-945. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06213-2. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
2
Breast Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making in Older African-American Women.老年非裔美国女性的乳腺癌筛查共享决策。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2020 Oct;112(5):556-560. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
Core Elements of Shared Decision-making for Women Considering Breast Cancer Screening: Results of a Modified Delphi Survey.
健康素养低下与乳腺癌筛查中更强的感知障碍以及对乳腺癌风险的高估有关。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 5;12:1053698. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1053698. eCollection 2022.
4
Patient-provider communication while using a clinical decision support tool: explaining satisfaction with shared decision making for mammography screening.在使用临床决策支持工具时的医患沟通:解释对 mammography screening 共享决策的满意度。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02058-3.
5
Women's preference to apply shared decision-making in breast cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment.女性在乳腺癌筛查中倾向于采用共同决策:一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 8;12(11):e064488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064488.
6
Impact of Breast Cancer Awareness Month on Public Interest in the United States between 2012 and 2021: A Google Trends Analysis.2012年至2021年期间美国乳腺癌防治月对公众关注度的影响:一项谷歌趋势分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 21;14(10):2534. doi: 10.3390/cancers14102534.
7
Effects of Exposure to Conflicting Information About Mammography on Cancer Information Overload, Perceived Scientists' Credibility, and Perceived Journalists' Credibility.关于乳房 X 光摄影术的相互矛盾的信息对癌症信息过载、感知科学家可信度和感知记者可信度的影响。
Health Commun. 2023 Oct;38(11):2481-2490. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2077163. Epub 2022 May 23.
8
Using Mixed Methods With Multiple Stakeholders to Inform Development of a Breast Cancer Screening Decision Aid for Women With Limited Health Literacy.采用混合方法并与多个利益相关者合作,为健康素养有限的女性开发乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具提供信息。
MDM Policy Pract. 2021 Jul 20;6(2):23814683211033249. doi: 10.1177/23814683211033249. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
考虑乳腺癌筛查的女性共同决策的核心要素:改良德尔菲调查结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1668-1677. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05298-8. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Predictors of Women's Awareness of the Benefits and Harms of Mammography Screening and Associations with Confusion, Ambivalence, and Information Seeking.女性对乳腺钼靶筛查利弊的认知预测因素以及与困惑、矛盾心理和信息寻求的关联
Health Commun. 2021 Mar;36(3):303-314. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1687129. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
5
Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Breast Density.医生对乳腺密度的知识、态度和实践。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Sep;28(9):1193-1199. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7429. Epub 2019 May 7.
6
Minority patient preferences, barriers, and facilitators for shared decision-making with health care providers in the USA: A systematic review.美国少数民族患者对与医疗保健提供者共同决策的偏好、障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jul;102(7):1251-1262. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
7
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.乳腺 X 线摄影共享决策的关键要素:文献的范围综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
8
Shared Decision-Making and Women's Adherence to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screenings.共享决策与女性对乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的依从性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 17;15(7):1509. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071509.
9
Scrutinizing screening: a critical interpretive review of primary care provider perspectives on mammography decision-making with average-risk women.审视筛查:对初级保健提供者关于与平均风险女性进行乳房X光检查决策观点的批判性解释性综述
Public Health Rev. 2018 Apr 23;39:15. doi: 10.1186/s40985-018-0092-9. eCollection 2018.
10
Efficacy of a telephone outcall program to reduce caregiver burden among caregivers of cancer patients [PROTECT]: a randomised controlled trial.电话随访计划对减轻癌症患者照顾者负担的效果[PROTECT]:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 8;18(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3961-6.