Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;35(2):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
This study aims to validate a biostatistical approach to predict the likely effectiveness of screening in reducing advanced disease in the absence of data on incident screen and interval cancers.
We derived the predicted relative reduction in advanced stage disease following screening from the expected proportion of advanced disease following screening and the observed proportion of advanced disease detected clinically among the controls. We compared the predicted estimates to those observed in a randomised trial.
Using our method, the predicted estimates of relative reduction in node positive breast cancer following screening were comparable to the observed estimates for the age groups 50-59 and 60-69 in the screening study (predicted 32% vs. observed 40% (p=0.274) and predicted 34% vs. observed 45% (p=0.068), respectively). However, for the age groups 40-49 and 70-74 the predicted values were overestimates of the likely effectiveness of screening compared to the observed values (predicted 38% vs. observed 16% (p=0.014) and predicted 34% vs. observed 0% (p=0.001), respectively).
When the number of cancer cases is more than hundred, the method of prediction using only prevalence screen data may be accurate. Where cancers are less common, for example in small populations or young age groups, further data from interval cancers or incidence screens may be necessary.
本研究旨在验证一种生物统计学方法,用于预测在缺乏关于首发筛查和间期癌症数据的情况下,筛查降低晚期疾病的可能性效果。
我们从筛查后晚期疾病的预期比例和对照组中临床检测到的晚期疾病的实际比例中得出筛查后晚期疾病的预测相对减少量。我们将预测估计值与随机试验中的观察值进行了比较。
使用我们的方法,在筛查研究中,年龄组为 50-59 岁和 60-69 岁的人群中,筛查后淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的预测相对减少量与观察到的估计值相当(预测为 32%,观察为 40%(p=0.274),预测为 34%,观察为 45%(p=0.068))。然而,对于年龄组为 40-49 岁和 70-74 岁的人群,与观察值相比,预测值高估了筛查的有效性(预测为 38%,观察为 16%(p=0.014),预测为 34%,观察为 0%(p=0.001))。
当癌症病例数超过一百时,仅使用患病率筛查数据进行预测的方法可能是准确的。在癌症不太常见的情况下,例如在小人群或年轻年龄组中,可能需要进一步的间期癌症或首发筛查数据。