National Institute of Occupational Health, Division of Applied Work Physiology, S-171 84 Solna, Sweden.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1996 Mar;6(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/1050-6411(95)00013-5.
Ramp calibration has been widely used in ergonomic studies of the shoulder-neck region as a method for estimating muscle forces or glenohumeral torque on the basis of surface electromyographic (EMG) amplitude from the upper trapezius muscle. The relationship between load and EMG amplitude is determined using least-square regression and the present study gives a statistical evaluation of this approach by analysing data from six healthy females performing isometric abductions and flexions of the arm. It is shown that a load estimate corresponding to 25% of maximal strength (25%MVC) may be provided only with a 95% confidence interval of +/- 10%MVC (median of intervals calculated on an individual basis). In many ramps the EMG amplitude residuals of neighbouring points after regression were shown to correlate significantly. This adds further to the length of the confidence interval. 'Short' ramps (load range: 18-31%MVC) generated similar load estimates as 'full' ramps (18-70% MVC), but with a significantly better confidence if inappropriate modelling was controlled for. Ergonomic analyses operating in a real-time domain will be particularly sensitive to errors in pointto-point load estimation and the study suggests that stable results may be obtained only at a group level.
斜坡校准已广泛应用于肩颈区域的人体工程学研究中,作为一种基于斜方肌上部表面肌电图(EMG)幅度来估计肌肉力或盂肱关节扭矩的方法。使用最小二乘法回归确定了负载和 EMG 幅度之间的关系,本研究通过分析 6 名健康女性进行的手臂等距外展和屈曲的数据分析,对这种方法进行了统计评估。结果表明,仅在 95%置信区间为 +/- 10%MVC(个体计算的中位数)的情况下,才能提供对应于最大力量的 25%(25%MVC)的负载估计值。在许多斜坡中,回归后相邻点的 EMG 幅度残差显示出显著的相关性。这进一步增加了置信区间的长度。“短”斜坡(负载范围:18-31%MVC)与“全”斜坡(18-70%MVC)产生相似的负载估计值,但如果控制了不合适的建模,则置信度显著提高。在实时域中运行的人体工程学分析对逐点负载估计的误差特别敏感,该研究表明,只有在群体水平上才能获得稳定的结果。