Division of Applied Work Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, S-171 84 Solna, Sweden.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1995 Dec;5(4):251-7. doi: 10.1016/1050-6411(95)00011-9.
Different procedures have been used for normalization of upper trapezius electromyographic (EMG) amplitudes. This complicates comparisons between studies. The present study aimed at investigating the influence of some commonly used trapezius EMG normalization procedures on the results of ergonomic analyses, as well as the test-retest repeatability of these procedures. EMG activity from the upper trapezius was recorded during an occupational task. The EMG activity was then normalized by seven different normalization procedures. It was shown that at the group level, a unilateral shoulder elevation maximal voluntary electrical (MVE) activation procedure gave 1.2 times higher occupational load estimates than a corresponding bilateral MVE. At the group level, the median load during the occupational task was 1.6 times higher when expressed as %MVC (maximal voluntary contraction) obtained from a power regression of relative force on EMG amplitude than when expressed as %MVE determined from a single maximal shoulder elevation. Normalizations in terms of a submaximal reference voluntary electrical (RVE) activation had similar test-retest repeatability in terms of the coefficient of variation (CV: 11-13%) as normalizations in terms of an MVE (CV: 11-15%), but the power regression procedures had considerably larger CVs (21-36%). The paper provides a basis for comparing previous studies using different normalization methods, as well as a qualitative evaluation of normalization methods for future use.
不同的程序已被用于正常化斜方肌肌电图(EMG)振幅。这使得研究之间的比较变得复杂。本研究旨在调查一些常用的斜方肌 EMG 归一化程序对人体工程学分析结果的影响,以及这些程序的测试-重测可重复性。在一项职业任务中记录了斜方肌上部的肌电图活动。然后,通过七种不同的归一化程序对 EMG 活动进行归一化。结果表明,在群体水平上,单侧肩部抬高最大自主电(MVE)激活程序比相应的双侧 MVE 给出的职业负荷估计值高 1.2 倍。在群体水平上,当用相对力与肌电图幅度的功率回归来表示作为%MVC(最大自主收缩)时,职业任务期间的中位数负荷比用从单次最大肩部抬高确定的%MVE 表示时高 1.6 倍。以亚最大参考自主电(RVE)激活为基准的归一化在变异性系数(CV:11-13%)方面与 MVE 基准的归一化(CV:11-15%)具有相似的测试-重测可重复性,但功率回归程序的 CV 要大得多(21-36%)。本文为比较使用不同归一化方法的先前研究提供了依据,也为未来使用归一化方法进行定性评估提供了依据。