• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗:最新进展与未来展望。

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: Recent developments and future prospects.

作者信息

Török M Estee, Chapman Ann L N, Lessing M P Albert, Sanderson Frances, Seaton R Andrew

机构信息

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Infectious Diseases, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.

出版信息

Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2010 Aug;11(8):929-39.

PMID:20721835
Abstract

Patients with serious infections requiring parenteral antimicrobial therapy are usually hospitalized for treatment. For certain conditions, however, administration of parenteral antibiotics outside the hospital setting may be safe, efficacious, convenient for patients and cost-beneficial. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) was developed in the US initially and its use has expanded globally during the past three decades. A wide variety of infections are amenable to treatment by OPAT. Once-daily agents such as ceftriaxone or teicoplanin and, more recently, antimicrobials such as ertapenem or daptomycin have been used for OPAT. The use of higher doses and less-frequent dosing of existing agents is being explored, and exciting new developments include the emergence of agents with broader-spectrum activity against drug-resistant organisms and the use of antifungal agents in the OPAT setting. Future prospects in OPAT include the use of more recently launched drugs such as telavancin, as well as drugs in development, including dalbavancin (Durata Therapeutics Inc) and omadacycline (PTK-0796; Novartis AG/PARATEK Pharmaceuticals Inc). This review outlines recent developments in, and future prospects for, the antimicrobial agents used in OPAT.

摘要

需要肠外抗菌治疗的严重感染患者通常需住院治疗。然而,对于某些情况,在医院外给予肠外抗生素可能是安全、有效的,对患者方便且具有成本效益。门诊肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT)最初在美国开展,在过去三十年中其应用已在全球范围内扩大。多种感染适合采用OPAT治疗。每日一次给药的药物如头孢曲松或替考拉宁,以及最近的抗菌药物如厄他培南或达托霉素已用于OPAT。目前正在探索使用更高剂量和更少给药频率的现有药物,令人兴奋的新进展包括出现了对耐药菌具有更广泛抗菌活性的药物以及在OPAT环境中使用抗真菌药物。OPAT的未来前景包括使用最近推出的药物如特拉万星,以及正在研发的药物,包括达巴万星(杜拉塔治疗公司)和奥玛环素(PTK - 0796;诺华公司/帕拉特克制药公司)。本综述概述了OPAT中使用的抗菌药物的最新进展和未来前景。

相似文献

1
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: Recent developments and future prospects.门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗:最新进展与未来展望。
Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2010 Aug;11(8):929-39.
2
Developments in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) for Gram-positive infections in Europe, and the potential impact of daptomycin.欧洲革兰氏阳性菌感染的门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT)的进展以及达托霉素的潜在影响
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Sep;64(3):447-53. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp245. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
3
Ertapenem: a new opportunity for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.厄他培南:门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗的新契机。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Jun;53 Suppl 2:ii83-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh210.
4
Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy: principles and practice.门诊患者的肠外抗生素治疗:原则与实践。
Eur J Intern Med. 2013 Oct;24(7):617-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
5
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT): is it safe for selected patients to self-administer at home? A retrospective analysis of a large cohort over 13 years.门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT):对选定患者而言,在家自行给药是否安全?一项针对超过13年的大型队列的回顾性分析
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Aug;60(2):356-62. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm210. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
6
[Daptomycin in outpatient antimicrobial parenteral therapy].门诊抗菌药物肠外治疗中使用达托霉素
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2012 Feb;30 Suppl 1:59-63. doi: 10.1016/S0213-005X(12)70074-5.
7
[Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in bone and joint infections].[骨与关节感染的门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT)]
Med Mal Infect. 2006 Mar;36(3):132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2006.01.002. Epub 2006 Mar 31.
8
[Development of antituberculous drugs: current status and future prospects].[抗结核药物的研发:现状与未来前景]
Kekkaku. 2006 Dec;81(12):753-74.
9
Current status in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a practical view.门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗的现状:实用视角
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2016 Apr;29(2):55-68. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
10
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT): a review of experience at Auckland Hospital.门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗(OPAT):奥克兰医院经验综述
N Z Med J. 2004 Aug 20;117(1200):U1020.

引用本文的文献

1
Current practices and challenges of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a narrative review.门诊患者的肠外抗菌治疗的现状和挑战:叙事性综述。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Sep 3;79(9):2083-2102. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae177.
2
Delivery of long-term-injectable agents for TB by lay carers: pragmatic randomised trial.由非专业护理人员提供结核病长效注射剂:实用随机试验。
Thorax. 2020 Jan;75(1):64-71. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212675. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
3
Clinical and cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of ommunity ntraenous ntibiotic ervice models: CIVAS systematic review.
社区静脉抗生素服务模式的临床及成本效益、安全性与可接受性:CIVAS系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 20;7(4):e013560. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013560.
4
Self-Administered Outpatient Antimicrobial Infusion by Uninsured Patients Discharged from a Safety-Net Hospital: A Propensity-Score-Balanced Retrospective Cohort Study.安全网医院出院的未参保患者自我管理门诊抗菌药物输注:一项倾向评分平衡的回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2015 Dec 15;12(12):e1001922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001922. eCollection 2015 Dec.
5
Community IntraVenous Antibiotic Study (CIVAS): protocol for an evaluation of patient preferences for and cost-effectiveness of community intravenous antibiotic services.社区静脉抗生素研究(CIVAS):一项评估患者对社区静脉抗生素服务的偏好及成本效益的方案。
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 21;5(8):e008965. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008965.
6
Comparative evaluation of the tolerability of cefazolin and nafcillin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections in the outpatient setting.头孢唑林与萘夫西林在门诊治疗甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌感染时耐受性的比较评估。
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Aug 1;59(3):369-75. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu301. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
7
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with ceftriaxone, a review.头孢曲松的门诊患者的肠外抗菌治疗:综述。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Jun;34(3):410-7. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9637-z. Epub 2012 Apr 17.