• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

In vivo scaling and root planing forces.

作者信息

Zappa U, Cadosch J, Simona C, Graf H, Case D

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 1991 May;62(5):335-40. doi: 10.1902/jop.1991.62.5.335.

DOI:10.1902/jop.1991.62.5.335
PMID:2072247
Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to assess the scaling and root planing forces exerted in vivo. Ten dentists and 10 dental hygienists scaled and root planed one aspect of an incisor in an adult patient with untreated advanced periodontitis. During scaling and root planing forces were recorded using a piezo-electric receiver, an electronic transducer, and an analogous writer. The forces were recorded in mA and converted into Newtons (N). The results showed that the mean scaling force applied by dentists was 5.70 N and ranged between 1.01 to 10.35 N. The corresponding values for dental hygienists were a mean of 5.38 N, and a range of 1.52 to 15.73 N. The root planing forces in dentists reached a mean of 4.62 N, and ranged between 0.86 to 8.88 N. For hygienists, these values were 4.58 N with a range of 1.56 to 10.59 N. Negative forces impacting on the periodontal soft tissues were also recorded. They were not present in all therapists, but consistently at work within specific therapists. During scaling these forces reached a mean of -0.40 N in dentists and -0.47 N in dental hygienists. During root planing, these forces were mean -0.59 N in dentists, and -0.81 N in hygienists. There were no statistically significant differences between scaling forces and root planing forces, nor between forces used by dentists and hygienists (P greater than 0.05). However, there were significant differences between the force levels of the individual therapists for all positive forces (P = 0.0001), and for negative forces during root planing (P = 0.0001). The technology and information provided by this investigation may enable studies evaluating clinical effectiveness of scaling and root planing doses.

摘要

相似文献

1
In vivo scaling and root planing forces.
J Periodontol. 1991 May;62(5):335-40. doi: 10.1902/jop.1991.62.5.335.
2
In vivo scaling and root planing forces in molars.
J Periodontol. 1993 May;64(5):349-54. doi: 10.1902/jop.1993.64.5.349.
3
In vivo ultrasonic debridement forces in bicuspids: a pilot study.双尖牙的体内超声清创力:一项初步研究。
J Periodontol. 2002 Apr;73(4):418-22. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.4.418.
4
Right- and left-handed dentists in periodontal therapy.牙周治疗中使用右手和左手的牙医。
Int J Neurosci. 2002 Jan;112(1):1-14.
5
Instruments and methods for the quantitative measurement of factors affecting hygienist/dentist efforts during scaling and root planing of the teeth.
J Clin Dent. 1996;7(2 Spec No):32-40.
6
Root substance removal by scaling and root planing.通过龈下刮治和根面平整去除根面物质。
J Periodontol. 1991 Dec;62(12):750-4. doi: 10.1902/jop.1991.62.12.750.
7
Quadrant root planing versus same-day full-mouth root planing. I. Clinical findings.象限根面平整术与同日全口根面平整术。I. 临床发现。
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Feb;31(2):132-40. doi: 10.1111/j.0303-6979.2004.00461.x.
8
The effects of EDTA gel conditioning exposure time on periodontitis-affected human root surfaces: surface topography and PDL cell adhesion.乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)凝胶预处理暴露时间对患牙周炎的人牙根表面的影响:表面形貌及牙周膜细胞黏附
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2003 Jan;5(1):11-22.
9
The clinical effectiveness of open versus closed scaling and root planing on multi-rooted teeth.开放与封闭刮治及根面平整术治疗多根牙的临床疗效
J Periodontol. 1993 Nov;64(11):1023-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.1993.64.11.1023.
10
Relative influence of scaling and root planing and occlusal adjustment on sulcular fluid flow.
J Periodontol. 1986 Nov;57(11):681-4. doi: 10.1902/jop.1986.57.11.681.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of various scaling instruments on the surface roughness of monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate.各种洁治器械对整体式氧化锆和二硅酸锂表面粗糙度的影响。
Eur Oral Res. 2023 Sep 6;57(3):133-137. doi: 10.26650/eor.20231109111.
2
Shear Bond Strength and Mode of Failure of Polypropylene Fibers in Orthodontic Flash-Free Adhesive.正畸免闪黏合剂中聚丙烯纤维的剪切粘结强度及失效模式
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Oct 4;14(19):4167. doi: 10.3390/polym14194167.
3
Effect of oral prophylactic instrumentation on the surface texture of all metal restorative materials.
口腔预防性器械操作对所有金属修复材料表面质地的影响。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015 Jan-Mar;15(1):39-45. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.155039.
4
Surface scratch assessment of titanium implant abutments and cementum following instrumentation with metal curettes.使用金属刮治器进行器械操作后钛种植体基台和牙骨质的表面划痕评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Mar;19(2):545-51. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1257-7. Epub 2014 May 23.