Suppr超能文献

经导管植入 Edwards Sapien 主动脉瓣假体后的传导障碍频率。

Frequency of conduction disturbances after transcatheter implantation of an Edwards Sapien aortic valve prosthesis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Rouen University Hospital and INSERM U, University of Rouen, France.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2010 Sep 1;106(5):707-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.04.029. Epub 2010 Jul 23.

Abstract

We evaluated the incidence of conduction abnormalities and requirement for permanent pacemaker in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the Edwards Sapien prosthesis. In 2009, >8,000 patients were treated with TAVI using 1 of the 2 commercialized models of bioprosthesis (Edwards Sapien, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California; and CoreValve, Medtronic, Irvine, California). Occurrence of conduction abnormalities including complete atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker has been reported after TAVI with the 2 models of valve, more frequently with the CoreValve. We analyzed standard 12-lead electrocardiograms of 69 consecutive patients in whom an Edwards Sapien prosthesis was successfully implanted. Electrocardiograms were examined before treatment, at day 1, and at 1-month follow-up. Heart rate, PR and QT intervals and QRS duration were measured and the presence of a first-, second-, or third-degree atrioventricular block was documented. There was a slight increase in heart rate and a discrete decrease in QT interval at day 1. These values had returned to baseline values at 1 month. There was no change in PR interval but a transitory increase in QRS duration was noted. Frequency of left bundle branch block increased from 14.5% at baseline to 27.5% at day 1 with a decreased incidence at day 30 (21.3%). Permanent pacemaker was required in only 3 patients (4.3%). In conclusion, in our experience, conductive disorders and requirement of a definitive pacemaker after implantation of an Edwards Sapien aortic bioprosthesis are infrequent. The physical properties of this prosthesis may explain this observation.

摘要

我们评估了经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)中使用 Edwards Sapien 人工生物瓣患者的传导异常发生率和永久性起搏器需求。2009 年,超过 8000 例患者使用了 2 种商业化的生物瓣模型(Edwards Sapien,爱德华生命科学公司,加利福尼亚州欧文;和 CoreValve,美敦力,加利福尼亚州欧文)进行 TAVI。这两种瓣膜模型都有报道称,TAVI 后会发生传导异常,包括需要永久性起搏器的完全房室传导阻滞,CoreValve 发生的频率更高。我们分析了 69 例连续成功植入 Edwards Sapien 人工生物瓣患者的标准 12 导联心电图。心电图在治疗前、第 1 天和 1 个月随访时进行检查。测量心率、PR 和 QT 间期以及 QRS 持续时间,并记录一度、二度或三度房室传导阻滞的存在情况。第 1 天心率略有增加,QT 间期略有缩短。这些值在 1 个月时恢复到基线值。PR 间期没有变化,但 QRS 持续时间短暂增加。左束支传导阻滞的频率从基线时的 14.5%增加到第 1 天的 27.5%,30 天时(21.3%)的发生率降低。仅 3 例(4.3%)患者需要永久性起搏器。总之,根据我们的经验,在植入 Edwards Sapien 主动脉生物瓣后,传导障碍和需要永久性起搏器的情况并不常见。该人工生物瓣的物理特性可能解释了这一观察结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验