• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跟车时的期望——对模拟驾驶任务中驾驶行为的影响。

Expectations while car following--the consequences for driving behaviour in a simulated driving task.

机构信息

Technische Universität Braunschweig, Department of Engineering and Traffic Psychology, Gaussstrasse 23, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):2158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.009. Epub 2010 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.009
PMID:20728676
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to better understand the causes of driver errors in the context of rear-end crashes. When drivers move in traffic they generate an overall assessment of the driving situation and what will happen in the near future. Certain cues in the traffic environment may create an expectation that some specific action is required. The more relevant cues are present, the more the driver will expect that some kind of intervention may be required. In contrary, if hardly any or no relevant cues are present, the driver does not anticipate that an imminent reaction will be necessary. This idea is supported by results from accident analyses which showed that in many cases, rear-end crashes occur in situations which are usually easy to handle (e.g. straight roads, low traffic density). In these situations, drivers may not anticipate that the driver in front will brake and they are thus following too closely to be able to react in time when the front vehicle suddenly brakes or stops. In order to test this hypothesis experimentally, in a driving simulator experiment different expectations were generated by varying the behaviour of a lead car (different braking behaviour, signalling or not before a turn). Driver behaviour was examined after these variations. The analyses partially confirm the influence of different expectations generated by the lead car's behaviour in the first phase of the scenario. Drivers with a respective expectation reacted faster when the car in front suddenly braked and signalled their manoeuvre before turning right at an intersection. However, during a car following phase, drivers did not adapt their speed or distance depending on this expectation. These results can be used to adapt a driver assistance system in car following situations. This should warn and intervene, especially in cases when drivers do not foresee the need for action and therefore cannot react in time.

摘要

本研究旨在更好地理解追尾事故中驾驶员失误的原因。当驾驶员在交通中行驶时,他们会对驾驶情况和近期将要发生的情况做出全面评估。交通环境中的某些提示可能会产生某种特定操作的预期。交通环境中存在的提示越相关,驾驶员就越会预期可能需要进行某种干预。相反,如果几乎没有或没有相关提示,驾驶员就不会预期需要立即做出反应。这一观点得到事故分析结果的支持,这些结果表明,在许多情况下,追尾事故发生在通常很容易处理的情况下(例如直路、低交通密度)。在这些情况下,驾驶员可能不会预期前车会刹车,因此跟车太近,以至于无法在前方车辆突然刹车或停车时及时做出反应。为了通过实验验证这一假设,在驾驶模拟器实验中,通过改变前车的行为(不同的刹车行为、转弯前是否有信号)来产生不同的预期。然后检查驾驶员在这些变化后的行为。分析结果部分证实了前车行为在情景第一阶段产生的不同预期的影响。当前面的汽车突然刹车并在右转进入十字路口前发出信号时,有相应预期的驾驶员反应更快。然而,在跟车阶段,驾驶员不会根据这种预期来调整他们的速度或距离。这些结果可用于在跟车情况下自适应驾驶员辅助系统。该系统应发出警告并进行干预,尤其是在驾驶员无法预见需要采取行动并且因此无法及时做出反应的情况下。

相似文献

1
Expectations while car following--the consequences for driving behaviour in a simulated driving task.跟车时的期望——对模拟驾驶任务中驾驶行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):2158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.009. Epub 2010 Aug 7.
2
Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.评估“直观”振动触觉警示信号在驾驶模拟器中预防前后端碰撞的有效性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Sep;38(5):988-96. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.002. Epub 2006 May 11.
3
Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?驾驶配备部分自主式前方碰撞预警系统的汽车:驾驶员的反应如何?
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):698-708. doi: 10.1177/0018720812439712.
4
Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures.使用替代安全措施验证驾驶模拟器。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jan;40(1):274-88. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.06.007. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
5
A driving simulator study of driver performance on deceleration lanes.减速车道上驾驶员表现的驾驶模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
6
Behavioural accident avoidance science: understanding response in collision incipient conditions.行为事故避免科学:理解碰撞初始条件下的反应
Ergonomics. 2003 Oct 10;46(12):1111-35. doi: 10.1080/0014013031000136386.
7
Commentary training improves responsiveness to hazards in a driving simulator.评论训练可提高驾驶模拟器中对危险的反应能力。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):2117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
8
Braking from different speeds: judgments of collision speed if a car does not stop in time.从不同速度刹车:如果汽车没有及时停下来,对碰撞速度的判断。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:487-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.08.015. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
9
Choice of time-headway in car-following and the role of time-to-collision information in braking.跟车时车头时距的选择以及碰撞时间信息在制动中的作用。
Ergonomics. 1996 Apr;39(4):579-92. doi: 10.1080/00140139608964482.
10
Responses to deceleration during car following: roles of optic flow, warnings, expectations, and interruptions.跟车减速过程中的反应:光流、警告、期望和中断的作用。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009 Dec;15(4):334-50. doi: 10.1037/a0017877.