• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

浆液性和黏液性交界性卵巢肿瘤:这两种实体之间真的存在差异吗?

Serous and mucinous borderline ovarian tumors: are there real differences between these two entities?

机构信息

Department of Gynecology Oncology, University Hospital of Canary Islands, Avda. Marítima del Sur s/n, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Dec;153(2):188-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.024. Epub 2010 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.024
PMID:20728981
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical outcome and pathological features of patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) with special emphasis on serous and mucinous histology.

STUDY DESIGN

Medical and anatomopathological records were reviewed in the Gynecological Oncology Department of the Canarian University Hospital between 1990 and 2005. Survival rates were analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

RESULTS

The study included 163 patients. Serous tumors corresponded to 68 cases and mucinous tumors to 91 cases. Eighty-nine percent of patients were at FIGO stage I, 1.2% at stage II and 9.8% at stage III. Serous histology was significantly related to the presence of peritoneal implants (22.4% vs 3.6%; p=0.001), positive peritoneal cytology (35.7% vs 8.5%; p=0.001) and bilaterality (27.9% vs 1.1%, p<0.0001). Event-free survival (EFS) rates at 2, 5 and 10 years were 96.7%, 92.7% and 90.5%, respectively, with a mean survival time of 183 months (CI 95% 172-193). Thirteen recurrence cases were found (7.9%) with a mean time to recurrence of 39.6 months (range 4-140). Overall survival (OS) rates at 2, 5 and 10 years were 100%, 96.4% and 93.6%, respectively, with a mean time of 189 months (CI 95% 179-198). Mucinous BOT were associated with significantly lower OS rates than serous BOT (10 years OS: 88.5% vs 98.2%; p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Serous tumors present more unfavorable anatomopathological characteristics but are associated with better prognosis than mucinous tumors. If mucinous BOT diagnosis is retained physicians should be aware that their aggressive potential is not negligible.

摘要

目的

评估特殊强调浆液性和黏液性组织学的交界性卵巢肿瘤(BOT)患者的临床结果和病理特征。

研究设计

1990 年至 2005 年期间,在加那利群岛大学医院妇科肿瘤科审查了医疗和解剖病理学记录。使用 Kaplan-Meier 技术分析生存率。

结果

研究包括 163 例患者。浆液性肿瘤 68 例,黏液性肿瘤 91 例。89%的患者处于 FIGO 分期 I 期,1.2%处于 II 期,9.8%处于 III 期。浆液性组织学与腹膜种植(22.4%对 3.6%;p=0.001)、阳性腹膜细胞学(35.7%对 8.5%;p=0.001)和双侧性(27.9%对 1.1%,p<0.0001)显著相关。2 年、5 年和 10 年无事件生存率(EFS)分别为 96.7%、92.7%和 90.5%,平均生存时间为 183 个月(95%CI 172-193)。发现 13 例复发病例(7.9%),复发时间平均为 39.6 个月(范围 4-140)。2 年、5 年和 10 年总生存率(OS)分别为 100%、96.4%和 93.6%,平均时间为 189 个月(95%CI 179-198)。黏液性 BOT 的 OS 率明显低于浆液性 BOT(10 年 OS:88.5%对 98.2%;p=0.01)。

结论

浆液性肿瘤具有更不利的解剖病理学特征,但与黏液性肿瘤相比具有更好的预后。如果保留黏液性 BOT 的诊断,医生应该意识到其侵袭性潜力不容忽视。

相似文献

1
Serous and mucinous borderline ovarian tumors: are there real differences between these two entities?浆液性和黏液性交界性卵巢肿瘤:这两种实体之间真的存在差异吗?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Dec;153(2):188-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.024. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
2
[Clinical and pathological features of borderline ovarian tumors].[卵巢交界性肿瘤的临床及病理特征]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Feb;38(2):81-4.
3
[Clinicopathologic features of 234 cases with borderline ovarian tumors].234例卵巢交界性肿瘤的临床病理特征
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Feb;44(2):116-20.
4
[Clinicopathologic analysis and expression of cyclin D1 and p53 of ovarian borderline tumors and carcinomas].卵巢交界性肿瘤和癌的临床病理分析及细胞周期蛋白D1和p53的表达
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Apr;42(4):227-32.
5
Is complete surgical staging necessary in patients with stage I mucinous epithelial ovarian tumors?对于Ⅰ期黏液性上皮性卵巢肿瘤患者,是否有必要进行完整的手术分期?
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Dec;103(3):878-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.022. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
6
[Borderline ovarian tumors].[卵巢交界性肿瘤]
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2002;42(1):23-5.
7
[Recurrence risk factors of platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer].[铂敏感型上皮性卵巢癌的复发危险因素]
Ai Zheng. 2005 Jun;24(6):751-4.
8
The recurrence and the overall survival rates of ovarian serous borderline neoplasms with noninvasive implants is time dependent.伴有非侵袭性种植的卵巢浆液性交界性肿瘤的复发率和总生存率与时间相关。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Nov;30(11):1367-71. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213294.81154.95.
9
[Clinical behavior of serous and mucinous borderline tumors of the ovary with diploid DNA stem line. Follow-up studies after organ preserving and non-organ preserving therapy].[具有二倍体DNA干细胞系的卵巢浆液性和黏液性交界性肿瘤的临床行为。保留器官和非保留器官治疗后的随访研究]
Zentralbl Gynakol. 2000;122(5):274-9.
10
KRAS and BRAF mutations in ovarian tumors: a comprehensive study of invasive carcinomas, borderline tumors and extraovarian implants.卵巢肿瘤中的KRAS和BRAF突变:对浸润性癌、交界性肿瘤和卵巢外种植体的综合研究
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Dec;103(3):883-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.05.029. Epub 2006 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The challenging management of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) in women of childbearing age.育龄期女性交界性卵巢肿瘤(BOTs)的挑战性管理。
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 23;9:973034. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.973034. eCollection 2022.
2
Retrospective Analysis of Factors Affecting Recurrence in Borderline Ovarian Tumors.影响卵巢交界性肿瘤复发因素的回顾性分析
South Asian J Cancer. 2020 Jul;9(3):168-173. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721192. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
3
Unilateral cystectomy and serous histology are associated with relapse in borderline ovarian tumor patients with fertility-sparing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
单侧附件切除术和浆液性组织学与保留生育功能的交界性卵巢肿瘤患者的复发相关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Nov;302(5):1063-1074. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05716-x. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
4
Diagnostic extended usefulness of RMI: comparison of four risk of malignancy index in preoperative differentiation of borderline ovarian tumors and benign ovarian tumors.RMI 的诊断扩展用途:比较四种卵巢肿瘤交界性和良性肿瘤术前鉴别风险的恶性指数。
J Ovarian Res. 2019 Sep 16;12(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0568-3.
5
When Is "Type I" Ovarian Cancer Not "Type I"? Indications of an Out-Dated Dichotomy.“Ⅰ型”卵巢癌何时并非“Ⅰ型”?过时二分法的指征
Front Oncol. 2018 Dec 21;8:654. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00654. eCollection 2018.
6
Recent concepts of ovarian carcinogenesis: type I and type II.卵巢癌发生的最新概念:I型和II型。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:934261. doi: 10.1155/2014/934261. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
7
Histologic distribution of borderline ovarian tumors worldwide: a systematic review.交界性卵巢肿瘤的全球组织学分布:一项系统评价。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jan;24(1):44-51. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2013.24.1.44. Epub 2013 Jan 8.