Suppr超能文献

锥形束 CT 和多层螺旋 CT 对羊下颌骨髁突骨折的诊断准确性。

Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and conventional multislice spiral tomography in sheep mandibular condyle fractures.

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry Istanbul Universitesi, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Sep;39(6):336-42. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/29930707.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

the aim of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) and multislice CT in artificially created fractures of the sheep mandibular condyle.

METHODS

63 full-thickness sheep heads were used in this study. Two surgeons created the fractures, which were either displaced or non-displaced. CBCT images were acquired by the NewTom 3G CBCT scanner (NIM, Verona, Italy) and CT imaging was performed using the Toshiba Aquillon multislice CT scanner (Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan). Two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional images and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions were evaluated by two observers who were asked to determine the presence or absence of fracture and displacement, the type of fracture, anatomical localization and type of displacement. The naked-eye inspection during surgery served as the gold standard. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were calculated with weighted kappa statistics. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses were used to compare statistically the area under the curve (AUC) of both imaging modalities.

RESULTS

kappa coefficients of intra- and interobserver agreement scores varied between 0.56 - 0.98, which were classified as moderate and excellent, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the imaging modalities, which were both sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of sheep condylar fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

this study confirms that CBCT is similar to CT in the diagnosis of different types of experimentally created sheep condylar fractures and can provide a cost- and dose-effective diagnostic option.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较锥形束 CT(CBCT)和多层 CT 对羊下颌骨髁突人工骨折的诊断准确性。

方法

本研究使用了 63 个全层羊头。由两名外科医生创建骨折,骨折为移位或未移位。使用 NewTom 3G CBCT 扫描仪(NIM,维罗纳,意大利)获取 CBCT 图像,使用东芝 Aquillon 多层 CT 扫描仪(东芝医疗系统,大田原,日本)进行 CT 成像。两名观察者评估二维(2D)横截面图像和三维(3D)重建,要求他们确定是否存在骨折和移位、骨折类型、解剖定位和移位类型。手术中的肉眼检查作为金标准。采用加权 kappa 统计计算观察者间和观察者内的一致性。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析比较两种成像方式的曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

观察者内和观察者间的kappa 系数评分在 0.56-0.98 之间,分别为中度和优秀。两种成像方式在诊断羊髁突骨折方面均具有敏感性和特异性,无统计学差异。

结论

本研究证实,CBCT 在诊断不同类型的实验性羊髁突骨折方面与 CT 相似,可以提供一种具有成本效益和剂量效益的诊断选择。

相似文献

3
Interpretation of mandibular condyle fractures using 2D- and 3D-computed tomography.
Braz Dent J. 2003;14(3):203-8. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402003000300012. Epub 2004 Mar 29.
4
Detection accuracy of condylar defects in cone beam CT images scanned with different resolutions and units.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(3):20130414. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130414. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
5
Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of simulated small osseous defects in the mandibular condyle.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Feb;145(2):143-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.014.
8
Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with multislice computed tomography in detection of small osseous condylar defects.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jul;150(1):130-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.12.019.
10
Volumetric analysis of the mandibular condyle using cone beam computed tomography.
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Aug;81(8):1812-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.070. Epub 2011 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

2
Detection and classification of mandibular fractures in panoramic radiography using artificial intelligence.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2024 Sep 1;53(6):363-371. doi: 10.1093/dmfr/twae018.
5
Evaluation of a low-dose protocol for cone beam computed tomography of the temporomandibular joint.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Sep 1;49(6):20190495. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20190495. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
6
New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies.
Imaging Sci Dent. 2019 Sep;49(3):179-190. doi: 10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.179. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
7
Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140235. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140235.
8
Clinical utility of dental cone-beam computed tomography: current perspectives.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2014 Apr 2;6:29-43. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S41621. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jun;38(6):609-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028. Epub 2009 May 21.
2
Assessment of optimal condylar position with limited cone-beam computed tomography.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.021.
4
What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?
Dent Clin North Am. 2008 Oct;52(4):707-30, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005.
5
Treatment of condylar fractures: A retrospective cohort study.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 Sep 1;13(9):E589-94.
6
Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):461-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
7
Cone beam computed tomography 3D reconstruction of the mandibular condyle.
Angle Orthod. 2008 Sep;78(5):880-8. doi: 10.2319/072007-339.1.
9
Closed reduction, open reduction, and endoscopic assistance: current thoughts on the management of mandibular condyle fractures.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Dec;120(7 Suppl 2):90S-102S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000260730.43870.1b.
10
Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging.
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Jun;66(3):396-418. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.11.019. Epub 2007 Dec 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验