Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry Istanbul Universitesi, Istanbul, Turkey.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Sep;39(6):336-42. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/29930707.
the aim of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) and multislice CT in artificially created fractures of the sheep mandibular condyle.
63 full-thickness sheep heads were used in this study. Two surgeons created the fractures, which were either displaced or non-displaced. CBCT images were acquired by the NewTom 3G CBCT scanner (NIM, Verona, Italy) and CT imaging was performed using the Toshiba Aquillon multislice CT scanner (Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan). Two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional images and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions were evaluated by two observers who were asked to determine the presence or absence of fracture and displacement, the type of fracture, anatomical localization and type of displacement. The naked-eye inspection during surgery served as the gold standard. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were calculated with weighted kappa statistics. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses were used to compare statistically the area under the curve (AUC) of both imaging modalities.
kappa coefficients of intra- and interobserver agreement scores varied between 0.56 - 0.98, which were classified as moderate and excellent, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the imaging modalities, which were both sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of sheep condylar fractures.
this study confirms that CBCT is similar to CT in the diagnosis of different types of experimentally created sheep condylar fractures and can provide a cost- and dose-effective diagnostic option.
本研究旨在比较锥形束 CT(CBCT)和多层 CT 对羊下颌骨髁突人工骨折的诊断准确性。
本研究使用了 63 个全层羊头。由两名外科医生创建骨折,骨折为移位或未移位。使用 NewTom 3G CBCT 扫描仪(NIM,维罗纳,意大利)获取 CBCT 图像,使用东芝 Aquillon 多层 CT 扫描仪(东芝医疗系统,大田原,日本)进行 CT 成像。两名观察者评估二维(2D)横截面图像和三维(3D)重建,要求他们确定是否存在骨折和移位、骨折类型、解剖定位和移位类型。手术中的肉眼检查作为金标准。采用加权 kappa 统计计算观察者间和观察者内的一致性。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析比较两种成像方式的曲线下面积(AUC)。
观察者内和观察者间的kappa 系数评分在 0.56-0.98 之间,分别为中度和优秀。两种成像方式在诊断羊髁突骨折方面均具有敏感性和特异性,无统计学差异。
本研究证实,CBCT 在诊断不同类型的实验性羊髁突骨折方面与 CT 相似,可以提供一种具有成本效益和剂量效益的诊断选择。