Orthodontic Department, Graduate School of Dentistry, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Jun;33(3):276-81. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq073. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
The purpose of this study was to compare the tensile bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using conventional multi-step adhesive, self-etching primer (SEP), which combines etching and priming into a single step, and self-adhesive systems, which combine etchant, primer, and adhesive. Metal brackets were bonded to 90 extracted human premolars according to three experimental protocols: group 1, conventional multi-step adhesive system; group 2, SEP; and group 3, self-adhesive system. All specimens were debonded using an Instron universal machine and failures between the tooth surface and bracket base were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bracket bases were then analysed by mapping of energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometry to calculate the distributive percentages of enamel or resin. The bond strength, percentage distribution, and calcium on the debonded interface were determined and analysed by one-way analysis of variance, and means were ranked by a Tukey interval, calculated at the 95 per cent confidence level. Group 1 produced the greatest bond strength, followed by groups 2 and 3. Group 3 showed the highest debonded interface between resin and enamel or within the resin itself, followed by groups 2 and 1. Groups 1 and 2 displayed significantly more debond failures at the interface between the bracket and the resin than group 3. More calcium particles were observed on the bracket base after debonding in group 3 than in groups 2 and 1. The simplified bonding procedures caused an undesirable decrease in tensile bond strength.
本研究旨在比较正畸托槽与釉质的粘结强度,使用传统的多步粘结剂、自酸蚀底漆(SEP)、自粘结系统,将酸蚀和底漆合二为一,将酸蚀剂、底漆和粘合剂合二为一。将金属托槽按照三种实验方案粘结到 90 颗离体人前磨牙上:组 1,传统多步粘结剂系统;组 2,SEP;组 3,自粘结系统。所有标本均采用 Instron 万能试验机进行离断,通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察牙面与托槽基底之间的失效情况。然后通过能量色散 X 射线(EDX)光谱映射对托槽基底进行分析,计算釉质或树脂的分布百分比。通过单因素方差分析确定和分析粘结强度、百分比分布和脱粘界面上的钙,在 95%置信水平下通过 Tukey 区间进行排序。组 1 产生的粘结强度最大,其次是组 2 和组 3。组 3 显示出树脂和釉质之间或树脂内部的脱粘界面最高,其次是组 2 和组 1。组 1 和组 2 在托槽和树脂之间的界面上显示出比组 3 更多的脱粘失败。在组 3 中,与组 2 和组 1 相比,在脱落后的托槽基底上观察到更多的钙颗粒。简化的粘结程序导致拉伸粘结强度不可避免地降低。