Suppr超能文献

使用不同蚀刻方法,用通用粘合剂粘结正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度比较。

Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a universal adhesive using different etching methods.

作者信息

Shafiei Fereshteh, Sardarian Ahmadreza, Fekrazad Reza, Farjood Amin

机构信息

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, School of Dentistry, Oral and Dental Disease Research Center (Shiraz, Iran).

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, School of Dentistry, Orthodontics Research Center (Shiraz, Iran).

出版信息

Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Sep 5;24(4):33.e1-33.e8. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.33.e1-8.onl.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three enamel etching modes - laser-etch, self-etch and acid-etch (5, 10 and 15 s) - on bracket bonding, using a universal adhesive.

METHODS

Eighty-four maxillary premolars were randomly divided into seven groups (n=12) based on the etching method and the adhesive used for bracket bonding. After water storage and thermocycling, shear bond strength was measured, and adhesive remnant index scores on debonded enamel were determined.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between the seven groups regarding bond strength values (p< 0.001). The highest values were observed in universal adhesive with laser etching group, while Transbond XT with acid or laser etching, and universal adhesive used in self-etch mode demonstrated the lowest bond strength. The universal adhesive with the three different etching times presented with statistically similar results, all showing an improvement in bond strength, compared with Scotchbond universal (SBU)/SE.

CONCLUSIONS

The universal adhesive evaluated in the present study demonstrated statistically similar bond strengths to conventional orthodontic adhesive in self-etch mode. The bond strength can be improved by adding an initial acid etching or laser conditioning step, although enamel damage was observed in some cases.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较三种釉质酸蚀模式(激光酸蚀、自酸蚀和酸蚀[5秒、10秒和15秒])使用通用型粘接剂时对托槽粘接的影响。

方法

根据酸蚀方法和用于托槽粘接的粘接剂,将84颗上颌前磨牙随机分为七组(每组n = 12)。经过水储存和热循环后,测量剪切粘接强度,并确定脱粘釉质上的粘接剂残留指数评分。

结果

七组之间的粘接强度值存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。通用型粘接剂激光酸蚀组观察到最高值,而Transbond XT酸蚀或激光酸蚀组以及自酸蚀模式下使用的通用型粘接剂显示出最低的粘接强度。通用型粘接剂在三种不同酸蚀时间下呈现出统计学上相似的结果,与Scotchbond通用型(SBU)/自酸蚀相比,均显示出粘接强度的提高。

结论

本研究中评估的通用型粘接剂在自酸蚀模式下与传统正畸粘接剂的粘接强度在统计学上相似。尽管在某些情况下观察到釉质损伤,但通过增加初始酸蚀或激光预处理步骤可以提高粘接强度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2749/6733226/b708d5feaa35/2176-9451-dpjo-24-04-33e1-gf1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验