成人心脏外科学质量评价：让我们使用同一种语言。
Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.
机构信息
Heart Center, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
出版信息
Neth Heart J. 2010 Aug;18(7-8):365-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03091793.
Abstract
Over the last years, measurements of quality of care have become more and more a public product, used by providers, purchasers and consumers, and patients. This information serves as an important guide for improvement, as well as a decision support tool for everybody taking part in medical treatment. This evolution can be compared with advertising and as in commercials it is important to use the right information. In this report we focus on the quality of adult cardiac surgery. Honest information is of course essential, but in this article attention is asked for the variables used to evaluate the quality of cardiac surgery. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:365-9.).
摘要
在过去的几年中，医疗服务质量的衡量标准越来越成为一种公共产品，被提供者、购买者和消费者以及患者使用。这些信息不仅是改进的重要指南，也是参与医疗的每个人的决策支持工具。这种演变可以与广告相媲美，就像在广告中一样，使用正确的信息非常重要。在本报告中，我们专注于成人心脏手术的质量。当然，诚实的信息是必不可少的，但本文还提请注意用于评估心脏手术质量的变量。（Neth Heart J 2010;18:365-9.）。
相似文献
1
Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.成人心脏外科学质量评价：让我们使用同一种语言。
Neth Heart J. 2010 Aug;18(7-8):365-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03091793.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验：一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.医疗服务量与健康结果：来自系统评价及意大利医院数据评估的证据
Epidemiol Prev. 2017 Sep-Dec;41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. doi: 10.19191/EP17.5-6S2.P001.100.
5
Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations.公开绩效数据对改变医疗保健消费者、专业人员或组织的行为所产生的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9(11):CD004538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004538.pub2.
6
Positron emission tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis.用于评估心肌活力的正电子发射断层扫描：基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(16):1-80. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
7
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis.用于评估心肌存活性的磁共振成像（MRI）：一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(15):1-45. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
8
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性：一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
9
Impact of public release of performance data on the behaviour of healthcare consumers and providers.医疗绩效数据公开对医疗消费者和提供者行为的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 6;9(9):CD004538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004538.pub3.
10
Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP): An Evidence-Based Analysis.增强型体外反搏（EECP）：基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(5):1-70. Epub 2006 Mar 1.
引用本文的文献
1
Comparing Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With and Without Using the Internal Mammary Artery in a Tertiary Care Hospital.在一家三级护理医院中，比较使用和未使用乳内动脉进行冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的结局。
Cureus. 2020 Sep 13;12(9):e10427. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10427.
2
Cardiac operative risk evaluation: The EuroSCORE II, does it make a real difference?心脏手术风险评估：EuroSCORE II，真的有区别吗？
Neth Heart J. 2012 Dec;20(12):494-8. doi: 10.1007/s12471-012-0327-1.
本文引用的文献
1
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Measure of Individual Surgeon Performance for Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force.胸外科医师协会成人心脏手术个体外科医生表现综合指标：胸外科医师协会质量测量特别工作组报告
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Oct;100(4):1315-24; discussion 1324-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.122. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
2
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: introduction.胸外科医师协会2008年心脏手术风险模型：引言。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S1. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.054.
3
Control charts, Cusum techniques and funnel plots. A review of methods for monitoring performance in healthcare.控制图、累积和技术与漏斗图。医疗保健中绩效监测方法的综述。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Sep;9(3):494-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.204768. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
4
The importance of an organized follow-up for the evaluation of mortality after hospital discharge in cardiac surgery.心脏手术后出院后死亡率评估中进行有组织随访的重要性。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 May;7(3):449-51. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2007.171678. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
5
A hospital-randomized controlled trial of an educational quality improvement intervention in rural and small community hospitals in Texas following implementation of information technology.
Am J Med Qual. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):418-27. doi: 10.1177/1062860607307995.
6
The identification and development of Canadian coronary artery bypass graft surgery quality indicators.加拿大冠状动脉搭桥手术质量指标的识别与制定。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Nov;130(5):1257. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.07.041.
7
American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care.美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会用于选择和制定量化心血管护理质量的绩效指标的方法。
Circulation. 2005 Apr 5;111(13):1703-12. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157096.95223.D7.
8
Cardiac surgery risk models: a position article.心脏手术风险模型：一篇立场文章。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Nov;78(5):1868-77. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.05.054.
9
Is no news good news? Organized follow-up, an absolute necessity for the evaluation of myocardial revascularization.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Oct;26(4):667-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.05.037.
10
Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes?衡量外科护理质量：结构、过程还是结果？
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Apr;198(4):626-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.11.017.
Zotero 插件