From Georgetown University Hospital Department of Radiology, Washington, DC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC; and United BioSource Inc, Bethesda, Maryland.
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;116(3):641-652. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ed36b3.
To assess the severity of symptoms caused by uterine leiomyomas, their effect on health-related quality of life, and the change after treatment compared with a normal control group.
A multicenter nonrandomized prospective study was completed assessing 12-month outcomes from three leiomyoma treatments. Outcome measures included the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life and the Short Form 36 questionnaires. Women scheduled for hysterectomy, myomectomy, or uterine artery embolization were recruited, as well as normal control group members. Questionnaires were completed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months posttreatment. Baseline characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. General linear models were used to examine differences among the patient groups.
A total of 375 patients completed baseline enrollment: 101 normal, 107 embolization, 61 myomectomy, and 106 hysterectomy. At baseline, the mean Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life Symptom Severity score for women in the normal control group was 15.3 (+/-14.5) and 64.8 (+/-20) for the leiomyoma patients (P<.001). At 6 and 12 months, the mean Symptom score for women in the normal control group was unchanged, while the leiomyoma treatment group score reduced to a mean of 17.8 (+/-17.5) at 12 months. Similar magnitude changes occurred among the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life health-related quality of life subscale scores for the normal control group members and leiomyoma patients. At 12 months, the hysterectomy group reported significantly lower symptoms and better health-related quality of life than the other two therapies (P<.001).
At 12 months after treatment, all three leiomyoma therapies resulted in substantial symptom relief, to near normal levels, with the greatest improvement after hysterectomy.
ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00390494.
II.
评估子宫肌瘤引起的症状严重程度、对健康相关生活质量的影响,以及与正常对照组相比治疗后的变化。
完成了一项多中心非随机前瞻性研究,评估了三种子宫肌瘤治疗方法的 12 个月结果。结果测量包括子宫肌瘤症状和生活质量问卷以及健康调查简表 36 项。招募了接受子宫切除术、子宫肌瘤切除术或子宫动脉栓塞术的患者以及正常对照组的成员。在基线和治疗后 6 个月和 12 个月时完成问卷。使用描述性统计方法总结基线特征。使用一般线性模型检查患者组之间的差异。
共有 375 名患者完成了基线入组:正常对照组 101 例,栓塞组 107 例,子宫肌瘤切除术组 61 例,子宫切除术组 106 例。在基线时,正常对照组女性的子宫肌瘤症状和生活质量症状严重程度评分平均为 15.3(+/-14.5),而子宫肌瘤患者为 64.8(+/-20)(P<.001)。在 6 个月和 12 个月时,正常对照组女性的平均症状评分保持不变,而子宫肌瘤治疗组的评分在 12 个月时降至 17.8(+/-17.5)。正常对照组和子宫肌瘤患者的子宫肌瘤症状和生活质量健康相关生活质量子量表评分也发生了类似幅度的变化。在 12 个月时,子宫切除术组报告的症状明显低于其他两种治疗方法,且健康相关生活质量更好(P<.001)。
在治疗后 12 个月,所有三种子宫肌瘤治疗方法都导致了症状的显著缓解,接近正常水平,子宫切除术的改善最大。
ClinicalTrials.gov,www.clinicaltrials.gov,NCT00390494。
II。