准则：我们永远都需要它们，有时会讨厌它们，而且必须让它们变得更好。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Guidelines: we'll always need them, we sometimes dislike them, and we have to make them better.

作者信息

Kahn R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2010 Nov;53(11):2280-4. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1885-7. Epub 2010 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00125-010-1885-7

PMID:20734022

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Guidelines: we'll always need them, we sometimes dislike them, and we have to make them better.准则：我们永远都需要它们，有时会讨厌它们，而且必须让它们变得更好。

Diabetologia. 2010 Nov;53(11):2280-4. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1885-7. Epub 2010 Aug 25.

Finnish Current Care Guideline for Diabetes: interactive approach to improve individualised treatment.芬兰糖尿病现行护理指南：采用交互式方法改善个性化治疗。

Diabetologia. 2011 May;54(5):1264-5. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2056-1. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

If we don't change direction soon, we'll end up where we're going.

Healthc Manage Forum. 2016 Mar;29(2):59-62. doi: 10.1177/0840470415626530. Epub 2016 Feb 12.

Fast forward. ASHA leaders imagine where we'll be in the year 2005.

ASHA. 1995 Jan;37(1):50-6.

Improving Decision-Making Processes in Health: Is It Time for (Disease-Specific) Reference Models?改善医疗卫生领域的决策过程：是时候采用（针对特定疾病的）参考模型了吗？

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Feb;18(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00510-6.

Limiting low-value care by "choosing wisely".通过“明智选择”来限制低价值医疗服务。

Virtual Mentor. 2014 Feb 1;16(2):131-4. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2014.16.02.pfor2-1402.

Whose Patient Is This? A Scoping Review of Patient Ownership.谁是患者的主人？患者所有权的范围综述。

Acad Med. 2019 Nov;94(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S95-S104. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002920.

[Not Available].

Rev Med Suisse. 2017 Apr 12;13(558):779-780.

Choosing Wisely.明智选择。

W V Med J. 2016 Nov-Dec;112(6):12.

The benefits of encouraging patients to email their doctor: a review of individual practice.

Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2014 Aug;99(4):152-6. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305856. Epub 2014 May 28.

引用本文的文献

Individualizing treatment targets for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: factors influencing clinical decision making in the 24-week, randomized INTERVAL study.为老年2型糖尿病患者个体化制定治疗目标：24周随机对照INTERVAL研究中影响临床决策的因素

Aging (Albany NY). 2017 Mar 5;9(3):769-777. doi: 10.18632/aging.101188.

Evidence base in guideline generation in diabetes.糖尿病指南制定的证据基础。

Diabetologia. 2013 Jun;56(6):1201-9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2872-6. Epub 2013 Mar 9.

Finnish Current Care Guideline for Diabetes: interactive approach to improve individualised treatment.芬兰糖尿病现行护理指南：采用交互式方法改善个性化治疗。

Diabetologia. 2011 May;54(5):1264-5. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2056-1. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

本文引用的文献

Gridlocked guidelines for diabetes.糖尿病的僵化指南

Lancet. 2010 Jun 26;375(9733):2203-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60714-3.

Is the ADA/EASD algorithm for the management of type 2 diabetes (January 2009) based on evidence or opinion? A critical analysis.ADA/EASD 算法（2009 年 1 月）在管理 2 型糖尿病方面基于证据还是观点？批判性分析。

Diabetologia. 2010 Jul;53(7):1258-69. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1702-3. Epub 2010 Mar 31.

Individualizing therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus based on patient characteristics: what we know and what we need to know.基于患者特征个体化 2 型糖尿病治疗：已知与未知。

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Apr;95(4):1566-74. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1966. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

Optimizing statin treatment for primary prevention of coronary artery disease.优化他汀类药物治疗以预防冠心病

Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jan 19;152(2):69-77. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-00004.

Tight control of blood glucose in long standing type 2 diabetes.长期2型糖尿病患者血糖的严格控制

BMJ. 2009 Mar 5;338:b800. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b800.

Why guideline-making requires reform.为何制定指南需要改革。

JAMA. 2009 Jan 28;301(4):429-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.15.

The ACCORD Trial and control of blood glucose level in type 2 diabetes mellitus: time to challenge conventional wisdom.ACCORD试验与2型糖尿病患者血糖水平的控制：是时候挑战传统观念了。

Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jan 26;169(2):150-4. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.518.

Intensive glycemic control and the prevention of cardiovascular events: implications of the ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VA diabetes trials: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and a scientific statement of the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association.强化血糖控制与心血管事件预防：ACCORD、ADVANCE及退伍军人糖尿病试验的启示：美国糖尿病协会立场声明及美国心脏病学会基金会与美国心脏协会科学声明

Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32(1):187-92. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9026. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病退伍军人的血糖控制与血管并发症

N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 8;360(2):129-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808431. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者高血糖的医学管理：起始和调整治疗的共识算法：美国糖尿病协会和欧洲糖尿病研究协会的共识声明。

Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32(1):193-203. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9025. Epub 2008 Oct 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验