Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Mar;19(3):418-23. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1243-9. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
The purpose of this study was to propose an objective description of femoral tunnel position expressed as time of the intercondylar clock in ACL reconstruction using a simple radiograph for the sake of objective discussion and technical improvement. The reproducibility of the method was evaluated in double-bundle (DB) reconstructions.
The first series of 54 knees in 54 patients who underwent primary "isometric" DB ACL reconstructions from 1995 to 2002 were randomly picked up. The second series of 48 knees in 48 patients with primary "anatomic" DB ACL reconstructions during 2007 were assessed as a recent femoral tunnel position with the same method. All DB reconstructions of ACL with the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles were performed with an arthroscopically assisted trans-tibial technique. The o'clock description of femoral tunnel placement was expressed using a weight-bearing posterior-anterior view at 45° of flexion (45° W/B PA view) of the knee. Assessment was undertaken with radiographs 1 year postoperatively.
The o'clock descriptions of femoral tunnel placement resulted in noon 40 min (standard deviation (SD): 10 min) for the AM bundle and one o'clock 40 min (SD: 20 min) for the PL bundle on average in the "isometric" reconstruction. In the "anatomic" reconstruction, the time descriptions of femoral tunnel placement were one o'clock 20 min (SD: 10 min) for the AM bundle and two o'clock 20 min (SD: 20 min) for the PL bundle on average. With the intra-examiner reproducibility assessment in the "anatomic" reconstruction, the differences between first and second assessments averaged 10 min (SD: 7 min) for femoral tunnel placement of the AM bundle and 12 min (SD: 9 min) of the PL bundle. Regarding the inter-examiner reproducibility, the differences between two examiners averaged 9 min (SD: 6 min) for femoral tunnel placement of the AM bundle and 14 min (SD: 9 min) of the PL bundle.
This simple radiographic assessment is reproducible and reliable for clinical use, and useful for the evaluation of ACL reconstructive procedures.
本研究旨在提出一种基于膝关节屈伸位前后位片的股骨隧道位置的客观描述方法,以时间来表示前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中髁间窝时钟的位置,以便进行客观讨论和技术改进。该方法的重复性在双束(DB)重建中进行了评估。
我们随机抽取了 1995 年至 2002 年期间接受初次“等距”DB ACL 重建的 54 例 54 膝患者的第 1 系列(54 膝),以及 2007 年期间接受初次“解剖”DB ACL 重建的 48 例 48 膝患者的第 2 系列(48 膝)。所有的 ACL DB 重建均采用关节镜辅助经胫骨技术进行。在膝关节 45°屈膝负重前后位片(45°负重 PA 位片)上,使用时钟描述法来表达股骨隧道的位置。术后 1 年进行影像学评估。
在“等距”重建中,AM 束的股骨隧道位置平均为 12 点 40 分(标准差(SD):10 分),PL 束的股骨隧道位置平均为 1 点 40 分(SD:20 分)。在“解剖”重建中,AM 束的股骨隧道位置平均为 1 点 20 分(SD:10 分),PL 束的股骨隧道位置平均为 2 点 20 分(SD:20 分)。在“解剖”重建中,对同一位观察者的重复性评估显示,AM 束和 PL 束的股骨隧道位置的首次和第二次评估之间的差异平均为 10 分钟(SD:7 分钟)和 12 分钟(SD:9 分钟)。关于观察者间的重复性,两位观察者之间的差异平均为 AM 束的股骨隧道位置为 9 分钟(SD:6 分钟)和 PL 束的股骨隧道位置为 14 分钟(SD:9 分钟)。
这种简单的影像学评估方法在临床应用中具有可重复性和可靠性,对于 ACL 重建手术的评估是有用的。