• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The effect of distractions in the operating room during endourological procedures.手术室内干扰对内镜泌尿外科手术的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):437-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1186-8. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
2
Effect of endourological procedures on erectile function: a prospective cohort study.腔内泌尿外科手术对勃起功能的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Jul;48(7):1055-9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1274-3. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
3
Evaluation of potential distractors in the urology operating room.泌尿科手术室潜在干扰因素的评估。
J Endourol. 2013 Sep;27(9):1161-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0704. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
4
Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments.术中干扰对患者安全的影响:使用验证工具的前瞻性描述性研究。
World J Surg. 2014 Apr;38(4):751-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2315-z.
5
The frequency and effects of distractions in operating theatres.手术室中的分心频率和影响。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 May;91(5):841-846. doi: 10.1111/ans.16799. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
6
Distractions in the operating room: a survey of the healthcare team.手术室内的干扰因素:医疗团队调查。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2316-2325. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09553-8. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
7
A systematic review of the effect of distraction on surgeon performance: directions for operating room policy and surgical training.分心对手术医生操作影响的系统评价:手术室政策及外科培训指南
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1713-24. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4443-z. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
8
Interruptions and distractions in the gynaecological operating theatre: irritating or dangerous?妇科手术室中的干扰与分心:令人恼火还是危险?
Ergonomics. 2015;58(8):1314-9. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1005171. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
9
Evaluating the effect of distractions in the operating room on clinical decision-making and patient safety.评估手术室中的干扰因素对临床决策和患者安全的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4499-504. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4782-4. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
10
The Impact of Operating Room Distractions on Stress, Workload, and Teamwork.手术室干扰对压力、工作负荷和团队合作的影响。
Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1079-84. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001051.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Surgical Safety and Efficiency: Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis of Surgical Data Recorders.提高手术安全性和效率:手术数据记录器的系统评价和单臂荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 28;27:e72703. doi: 10.2196/72703.
2
Creating Clarity Amid the Operating Room Clamor: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Noise-Related Barriers and Facilitators to Effective Communication.在手术室喧嚣中创造清晰:对与噪声相关的有效沟通障碍和促进因素的混合方法分析
ORL Head Neck Nurs. 2025 Spring;43(2):15-25.
3
Operating room organization and surgical performance: a systematic review.手术室组织与手术绩效:一项系统综述。
Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Jan 29;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00388-3.
4
Broad Responses and Attitudes to Having Music in Surgery (The BRAHMS Study): An Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand Perspective.手术中使用音乐的广泛反应和态度(BRAHMS研究):澳大利亚和新西兰视角
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Jan 2;17:30-34. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.12.009. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Effects of wide-angle laparoscopy on surgical workflow in laparoscopic cholecystectomies.广角腹腔镜对腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术流程的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5760-5765. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10230-7. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
Comparing complications and perioperative teams in microsurgical breast reconstruction: retrospective cohort study.显微外科乳房重建中的并发症与围手术期团队比较:回顾性队列研究。
Gland Surg. 2022 Nov;11(11):1754-1763. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-295.
7
A Concern for Intraoperative Distractions and Interference: An Observational Study Identifying, Measuring, and Quantifying Both within the Operating Theatre.对术中干扰因素的关注:一项在手术室中识别、测量和量化干扰因素的观察性研究。
Surg Res Pract. 2021 Dec 11;2021:9910290. doi: 10.1155/2021/9910290. eCollection 2021.
8
Patient mortality after surgery on the surgeon's birthday: observational study.外科医生生日当天手术后的患者死亡率:观察性研究。
BMJ. 2020 Dec 10;371:m4381. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4381.
9
Applicability of the Disruptions in Surgery Index in the Cardiovascular Management Scenarios - A Marker for Developing Functionally Efficient Teams.手术干扰指数在心血管管理方案中的适用性——打造高效能团队的指标。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Aug 6;36(4):445-452. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0685.
10
Using flow disruptions to understand healthcare system safety: A systematic review of observational studies.利用流程中断来理解医疗系统安全:观察性研究的系统评价。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jan;98:103559. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103559. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Do absorption and realistic distraction influence performance of component task surgical procedure?吸收和现实分心是否会影响手术的分任务绩效?
Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):902-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0689-7. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
2
Continuous recording and interobserver agreement algorithms reported in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (1995-2005).《应用行为分析杂志》(1995 - 2005年)中报道的连续记录和观察者间一致性算法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;42(1):165-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-165.
3
Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors: the role of load.无法完全忽略完全不相关的干扰因素:负荷的作用。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Mar;14(1):73-83. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.1.73.
4
The contribution of passengers versus mobile phone use to motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance by the driver.乘客因素与使用手机因素对导致驾驶员前往医院就诊的机动车碰撞事故的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Nov;39(6):1170-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.004. Epub 2007 Apr 9.
5
Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons.经验丰富的外科医生可以同时做不止一件事:分心对经验丰富和新手外科医生执行简单腹腔镜和认知任务的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):196-201. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9452-0.
6
Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery.量化泌尿外科手术中的注意力分散和干扰因素。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr;16(2):135-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019711.
7
Distraction in the urology operating theatre.泌尿外科手术室中的干扰因素。
BJU Int. 2007 Mar;99(3):493-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06573.x. Epub 2007 Jan 12.
8
The sounds of music in the operating room.手术室里的音乐声。
Injury. 2008 May;39(5):592-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.06.021. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
9
Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance.驾驶员注意力分散:车内并行任务、道路环境复杂性和年龄对驾驶性能的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Jan;38(1):185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.09.007. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
10
Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study.手机在导致伤者前往医院就诊的机动车碰撞事故中的作用:一项病例交叉研究。
BMJ. 2005 Aug 20;331(7514):428. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38537.397512.55. Epub 2005 Jul 12.

手术室内干扰对内镜泌尿外科手术的影响。

The effect of distractions in the operating room during endourological procedures.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):437-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1186-8. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-1186-8
PMID:20734086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3032204/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Professionals working in the operating room (OR) are subject to various distractions that can be detrimental to their task performance and the quality of their work. This study aimed to quantify the frequency, nature, and effect on performance of (potentially) distracting events occurring during endourological procedures and additionally explored urologists' and residents' perspectives on experienced ill effects due to distracting factors.

METHODS

First, observational data were collected prospectively during endourological procedures in one OR of a teaching hospital. A seven-point ordinal scale was used to measure the level of observed interference with the main task of the surgical team. Second, semistructured interviews were conducted with eight urologists and seven urology residents in two hospitals to obtain their perspectives on the impact of distracting factors.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight procedures were observed. A median of 20 distracting events occurred per procedure, which corresponds to an overall rate of one distracting event every 1.8 min. Equipment problems and procedure-related and medically irrelevant communication were the most frequently observed causes of interruptions and identified as the most distracting factors in the interviews. Occurrence of distracting factors in difficult situations requiring high levels of concentration was perceived by all interviewees as disturbing and negatively impacting performance. The majority of interviewees (13/15) thought distracting factors impacted more strongly on residents' compared to urologists' performance due to their different levels of experience.

CONCLUSION

Distracting events occur frequently in the OR. Equipment problems and communication, the latter both procedure-related and medically irrelevant, have the largest impact on the sterile team and regularly interrupt procedures. Distracting stimuli can influence performance negatively and should therefore be minimized. Further research is required to determine the direct effect of distraction on patient safety.

摘要

背景

手术室(OR)中的专业人员会受到各种干扰,这可能会对他们的任务表现和工作质量产生不利影响。本研究旨在量化发生在腔内泌尿外科手术过程中潜在干扰事件的频率、性质和对性能的影响,并探讨泌尿科医生和住院医师对因干扰因素而产生的不良影响的看法。

方法

首先,在一家教学医院的一个 OR 中,前瞻性地收集腔内泌尿外科手术的观察数据。使用七点有序量表来衡量观察到的对手术团队主要任务的干扰程度。其次,在两家医院对 8 名泌尿科医生和 7 名泌尿科住院医师进行半结构化访谈,以了解他们对干扰因素影响的看法。

结果

观察了 78 例手术。每例手术平均发生 20 次干扰事件,相当于每 1.8 分钟发生一次干扰事件。设备问题、与手术相关和与医疗无关的沟通是最常观察到的中断原因,并在访谈中被确定为最具干扰性的因素。所有受访者都认为,在需要高度集中注意力的困难情况下发生干扰因素会令人不安,并对表现产生负面影响。大多数受访者(13/15)认为,由于经验水平不同,干扰因素对住院医师的表现影响比对泌尿科医生的表现影响更大。

结论

干扰事件在 OR 中频繁发生。设备问题和沟通,包括与手术相关和与医疗无关的沟通,对无菌团队的影响最大,并经常中断手术。干扰刺激会对性能产生负面影响,因此应尽量减少。需要进一步研究以确定分心对患者安全的直接影响。