• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术室内的干扰因素:医疗团队调查。

Distractions in the operating room: a survey of the healthcare team.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Bariatric & Minimally Invasive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2316-2325. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09553-8. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-022-09553-8
PMID:36070145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9450817/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Distractions during surgical procedures are associated with team inefficiency and medical error. Little is published about the healthcare provider's perception of distraction and its adverse impact in the operating room. We aim to explore the perception of the operating room team on multiple distractions during surgical procedures.

METHODS

A 26-question survey was administered to surgeons, anesthesia team members, nurses, and scrub technicians at our institution. Respondents were asked to identify and rank multiple distractions and indicate how each distraction might affect the flow of surgery.

RESULTS

There was 160 responders for a response rate of 19.18% (160/834), of which 71 (44.1%) male and 82 (50.9%) female, 48 (29.8%) surgeons, 59 (36.6%) anesthesiologists, Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNA), and 53 (32.9%) OR nurses and scrub technicians. Responders were classified into a junior group (< 10 years of experience) and a senior group (≥ 10 years). Auditory distraction followed by equipment were the most distracting factors in the operating room. All potential auditory distractions in this survey were associated with higher percentage of certain level of negative impact on the flow of surgery except for music. The top 5 distractors belonged to equipment and environment categories. Phone calls/ pagers/ beepers and case relevant communications were consistently among the top 5 most common distractors. Case relevant communications, music, teaching, and consultation were the top 4 most perceived positive impact on the flow of surgery. Distractors with higher levels of "bothersome" rating appeared to associate with a higher level of perceived negative impact on the flow of surgery. Vision was the least distracting factor and appeared to cause minimal positive impact on the flow of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first survey studying perception of surgery, anesthesia, and OR staff on various distractions in the operating room. Fewer unnecessary distractions might improve the flow of surgery, improve OR teamwork, and potentially improve patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

手术过程中的分心会导致团队效率低下和医疗失误。关于医疗保健提供者对分心的看法及其在手术室中的不良影响,发表的内容很少。我们旨在探讨手术室团队对手术过程中多种分心因素的看法。

方法

我们向医院的外科医生、麻醉团队成员、护士和手术室技术员发放了一份包含 26 个问题的调查问卷。受访者被要求识别和对多项分心因素进行排名,并指出每项分心因素如何影响手术流程。

结果

共有 160 名受访者做出了回应,回应率为 19.18%(160/834),其中 71 名男性(44.1%)和 82 名女性(50.9%),48 名外科医生(29.8%)、59 名麻醉师、注册护士麻醉师(CRNA)(36.6%)和 53 名手术室护士和手术室技术员(32.9%)。受访者被分为初级组(<10 年经验)和高级组(≥10 年经验)。在手术室中,听觉干扰其次是设备干扰,是最具干扰性的因素。本调查中的所有潜在听觉干扰因素都与手术流程受到更高程度负面影响的百分比相关,除了音乐。排名前五的干扰因素属于设备和环境类别。电话/寻呼机/蜂鸣器和与病例相关的通讯一直是排名前五的最常见干扰因素。与病例相关的通讯、音乐、教学和咨询是对手术流程最具感知积极影响的前四项因素。“令人烦恼”程度评分较高的干扰因素似乎与对手术流程的感知负面影响程度较高相关。视觉是最不具干扰性的因素,对手术流程的积极影响最小。

结论

据我们所知,这是首次调查手术、麻醉和手术室工作人员对手术室中各种干扰因素的看法。减少不必要的干扰因素可能会改善手术流程、提高手术室团队合作,并有可能改善患者的治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1778/9450817/680b825b5f04/464_2022_9553_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1778/9450817/4cdf491f6482/464_2022_9553_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1778/9450817/37f185b43643/464_2022_9553_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1778/9450817/850bcb315ace/464_2022_9553_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1778/9450817/680b825b5f04/464_2022_9553_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1778/9450817/4cdf491f6482/464_2022_9553_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1778/9450817/37f185b43643/464_2022_9553_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1778/9450817/850bcb315ace/464_2022_9553_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1778/9450817/680b825b5f04/464_2022_9553_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Distractions in the operating room: a survey of the healthcare team.手术室内的干扰因素:医疗团队调查。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2316-2325. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09553-8. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Evaluation of potential distractors in the urology operating room.泌尿科手术室潜在干扰因素的评估。
J Endourol. 2013 Sep;27(9):1161-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0704. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
3
Distraction in the operating room: A narrative review of environmental and self-initiated distractions and their effect on anesthesia providers.手术室中的干扰因素:关于环境及自主引发的干扰因素及其对麻醉医护人员影响的叙述性综述
J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb;68:110110. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110110. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
4
Distraction-Free Induction Zone: A Quality Improvement Initiative at a Large Academic Children's Hospital to Improve the Quality and Safety of Anesthetic Care for Our Patients.无干扰诱导区:在一家大型学术儿童医院实施的质量改进计划,旨在提高我们患者的麻醉护理质量和安全性。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Sep;129(3):794-803. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003879.
5
The Impact of Operating Room Distractions on Stress, Workload, and Teamwork.手术室干扰对压力、工作负荷和团队合作的影响。
Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1079-84. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001051.
6
A systematic review of the effect of distraction on surgeon performance: directions for operating room policy and surgical training.分心对手术医生操作影响的系统评价:手术室政策及外科培训指南
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1713-24. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4443-z. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
7
Surgical Flow Disruptions, a Pilot Survey with Significant Clinical Outcome Implications.手术流程中断,具有显著临床结果影响的初步调查。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Aug 18;24(10):60. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-00896-2.
8
Evaluation of the Impact of Intraoperative Distractions on Teamwork, Stress, and Workload.评价术中干扰对团队合作、压力和工作负荷的影响。
J Surg Res. 2021 Mar;259:465-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
9
Prevalence of Potentially Distracting Noncare Activities and Their Effects on Vigilance, Workload, and Nonroutine Events during Anesthesia Care.麻醉护理期间潜在分散注意力的非护理活动的发生率及其对警觉性、工作量和非日常事件的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2018 Jan;128(1):44-54. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001915.
10
The Perception and Attitude Toward Noise and Music in the Operating Room: A Systematic Review.手术室环境中对噪声和音乐的感知与态度:系统评价。
J Surg Res. 2021 Jul;263:193-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.01.038. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Flush Model: A Novel Framework to Manage Surgeons' Mental Fatigue and Cognitive Load.冲洗模型:一种管理外科医生精神疲劳和认知负荷的新框架。
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Jun 5;6(2):e581. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000581. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Job embeddedness and missed nursing care at the operating theatres: the mediating role of polychronicity.手术室中的工作嵌入性与护理缺失:多元时间观的中介作用
BMC Nurs. 2023 Dec 4;22(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01628-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Distraction in the operating room: A narrative review of environmental and self-initiated distractions and their effect on anesthesia providers.手术室中的干扰因素:关于环境及自主引发的干扰因素及其对麻醉医护人员影响的叙述性综述
J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb;68:110110. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110110. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
2
Characterization of device-related interruptions in minimally invasive surgery: need for intraoperative data and effective mitigation strategies.微创手术中器械相关中断的特征:术中数据的需求和有效的缓解策略。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):717-723. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6254-5. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
3
Noise in the Operating Room Distracts Members of the Surgical Team. An Observational Study.
手术室噪音会分散手术团队成员的注意力。一项观察性研究。
World J Surg. 2018 Dec;42(12):3880-3887. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4730-7.
4
Simulation-Based Testing of Pager Interruptions During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.基于模拟的腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间寻呼机中断测试
J Surg Educ. 2018 Sep-Oct;75(5):1351-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
Assessment of operating room airflow using air particle counts and direct observation of door openings.利用空气颗粒计数和对门开启情况的直接观察来评估手术室气流。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 May 1;45(5):477-482. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.12.018. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
6
Evaluating the Impact of Intraoperative Surgical Team Handoffs on Patient Outcomes.评估术中手术团队交接对患者预后的影响。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Sep/Oct;23(5):288-292. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000370.
7
Cell Phone Calls in the Operating Theater and Staff Distractions: An Observational Study.手术室中的手机通话和人员分心:一项观察性研究。
J Patient Saf. 2019 Dec;15(4):e52-e55. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000351.
8
Effect of noise on tasks in operating theatres: a survey of the perceptions of healthcare staff.噪声对手术室任务的影响:医护人员认知情况调查
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Feb;55(2):164-167. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
9
Intraoperative Handoffs and Postoperative Complications Among Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Oncology Operations.妇科肿瘤手术患者的术中交接与术后并发症
J Healthc Qual. 2017 Jul/Aug;39(4):e42-e48. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000042.
10
The Impact of Operating Room Distractions on Stress, Workload, and Teamwork.手术室干扰对压力、工作负荷和团队合作的影响。
Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1079-84. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001051.