INRA Station d'Hydrobiologie, UMR ECOBIOP INRA/UPPA, Quartier Ibarron, 64310 St Pée sur Nivelle, France.
J Fish Biol. 2009 Jun;74(9):2002-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02269.x.
To better understand migratory divergences among Anguilla anguilla glass eels, the behaviour of individuals caught at the time of their estuary entrance was studied through their response to a light:dark cycle and then to both water current reversal and light:dark cycle. In a first experiment, fish moving with the flow in response to dusk (M(+) fish) and fish that had not exhibited any movement (M(-) fish) were distinguished. Anguilla anguilla from these two groups were then individually marked and their response to water current reversal compared. M(+) individuals mainly exhibited negative rheotaxis with a tidal periodicity, whereas positive rheotaxis was mainly exhibited by M(-) individuals. Thus, M(+)A. anguilla glass eels showing negative rheotaxis appear to have the strongest propensity to migrate, the converse applies to M(-) ones showing positive rheotaxis. A small percentage of individuals (5%) were hyperactive, alternately swimming with and against the current with almost no resting phase. These fish lost c. 2 mg wet mass day(-1), whereas individuals which were almost inactive lost c. 1 mg day(-1). Wet and dry mass changes in relation to activity levels were compared with previous experiments and it was concluded that A. anguilla glass eel energy status might be involved in differences in migratory tendencies but other factors that might be important are discussed. It is proposed that any decrease in A. anguilla glass eel energy stores associated with global warming might lead to an increase in the proportion of sedentary individuals and thus be involved in the decrease in the recruitment to freshwater habitats.
为了更好地理解玻璃鳗在洄游过程中的分化,研究了进入河口时个体的行为,方法是观察它们对光暗周期的反应,然后观察它们对水流反转和光暗周期的反应。在第一个实验中,根据鱼在黄昏时随流移动(M(+)鱼)和没有任何移动的鱼(M(-)鱼)来区分鱼。然后分别对这两组鱼进行标记,并比较它们对水流反转的反应。M(+)个体主要表现出具有潮汐周期性的负趋流性,而 M(-)个体主要表现出正趋流性。因此,表现出负趋流性的 M(+)玻璃鳗似乎有最强的洄游倾向,而表现出正趋流性的 M(-)玻璃鳗则相反。一小部分个体(5%)表现出过度活跃,几乎没有休息阶段,交替地随流和逆流游动。这些鱼每天损失约 2 毫克湿重,而几乎不活动的个体每天损失约 1 毫克。将与活动水平相关的湿重和干重变化与之前的实验进行了比较,得出的结论是,玻璃鳗的能量状态可能与其洄游倾向的差异有关,但也讨论了其他可能重要的因素。有人提出,由于全球变暖导致玻璃鳗能量储备减少,可能会导致静止个体的比例增加,从而参与到淡水生境中种群数量的减少。