Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern CH-3010, Switzerland.
Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1147-55. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181ed114e. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
Surgical and anesthesia-related techniques may reduce physical stress for patients undergoing high-risk surgery, but major surgery is increasingly performed in patients with substantial comorbidities. Strategies for improving the outcome for such patients include approaches that both increase tissue oxygen delivery and reduce metabolic demand. However, these strategies have produced conflicting results. To understand the success and failure of attempts to improve postoperative outcome, the pathophysiology of perioperative hemodynamic, metabolic, and immunological alterations should be analyzed. Our aim in this review is to provide a survey of fields of opportunities for improving outcome after major surgery. The issues are approached from 3 different angles: the view of the patient, the view of the surgical intervention, and the view of the anesthesia. Special attention is also given to what could be considered the result of the interaction among the 3: perioperative inflammation and immune response.
手术和麻醉相关技术可以减轻高危手术患者的身体应激,但越来越多的重大手术是在患有大量合并症的患者中进行的。改善此类患者预后的策略包括既能增加组织氧供又能降低代谢需求的方法。然而,这些策略的结果却相互矛盾。为了了解改善术后转归的尝试的成败,应分析围手术期血流动力学、代谢和免疫改变的病理生理学。我们在这篇综述中的目的是提供一个改善重大手术后转归机会的领域调查。这些问题从 3 个不同角度进行探讨:患者的观点、手术干预的观点和麻醉的观点。还特别关注可以被认为是 3 者相互作用的结果的问题:围手术期炎症和免疫反应。