Wound Care Education Program, College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, and Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University Hospital, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2010 Sep-Oct;37(5):475-86. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3181eda0c5.
The purpose of this study was to determine if toe pressures (TPs) obtained by a registered nurse using a portable photophlethysmograph (PPG) were equivalent to TPs obtained by a registered vascular technologist (RVT) using standard laboratory equipment.
A within-subjects, comparative design was used for the study.
Thirty subjects referred to a vascular laboratory for arterial studies were recruited. All tests were performed in the outpatient vascular laboratory of a large, urban medical center.
Toe pressures were measured on subjects by the same RN and RVT during the same visit. Data were analyzed using the Bland-Altman method that compares bias (mean difference) and precision (limits of agreement) of measurements to previously determined criterion for clinically important limits of difference (±15 mm Hg) in order to assess equivalence and repeatability of measurements. Kappa statistic was calculated to assess RVT/RN agreement to detect lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) (ie, TP<50 mm Hg). Sensitivity and specificity of the portable PPG measures were determined.
Precision for RVT-RN TPs exceeded the previously determined cutoff criteria (±15 mm Hg), but precision for repeated RN PPG measures fell within the clinically important limits. Kappa statistic calculation (κ=0.76) revealed substantial agreement (90%) between the RVT and RN measures to detect LEAD (<50 mm Hg). The portable PPG technique had good sensitivity (79%) and high specificity (95%) for detection of LEAD.
Although TPs obtained by the portable PPG were not equivalent to standard laboratory tests, the portable technique agreed sufficiently with the RVT to detect LEAD. The good sensitivity and high specificity of the portable PPG make it suitable for nurses and other primary care providers to use for high-risk patients or patients with wounds, when the ankle brachial index either is elevated above 1.3 or cannot be performed. Photophlethysmograph is also suitable to assess healing potential and the need for referrals to the vascular laboratory, surgeon, or the need for adjunctive therapies.
本研究旨在确定使用便携式光电体积描记仪(PPG)的注册护士获得的足趾压力(TP)是否等同于使用标准实验室设备的注册血管技术人员(RVT)获得的 TP。
本研究采用了受试者内比较设计。
招募了 30 名因动脉研究而被转诊至血管实验室的受试者。所有测试均在一家大型城市医疗中心的门诊血管实验室进行。
同一名注册护士和 RVT 在同一次就诊时对受试者的足趾压力进行测量。使用 Bland-Altman 方法分析数据,该方法比较了测量的偏倚(平均差值)和精度(一致性界限)与先前确定的临床重要差异界限(±15mmHg)的标准,以评估测量的等效性和可重复性。计算kappa 统计量以评估 RVT/RN 检测下肢动脉疾病(LEAD)(即 TP<50mmHg)的一致性。确定便携式 PPG 测量的敏感性和特异性。
RVT-RN TP 的精度超过了先前确定的截止标准(±15mmHg),但重复 RN PPG 测量的精度在临床重要范围内。kappa 统计量计算(κ=0.76)显示 RVT 和 RN 测量值之间存在实质性一致(90%),可用于检测 LEAD(<50mmHg)。便携式 PPG 技术对 LEAD 的检测具有良好的敏感性(79%)和高特异性(95%)。
尽管便携式 PPG 获得的 TP 与标准实验室测试不相等,但该技术与 RVT 足够一致,可用于检测 LEAD。便携式 PPG 具有良好的敏感性和高特异性,适合护士和其他初级保健提供者在踝肱指数升高至 1.3 以上或无法进行时,用于高危患者或有伤口的患者。光电体积描记术也适合评估愈合潜力以及向血管实验室、外科医生转诊的必要性,或需要辅助治疗的必要性。