• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症门诊患者中重度抑郁症的筛查:9 项患者健康问卷的诊断准确性。

Screening for major depression in cancer outpatients: the diagnostic accuracy of the 9-item patient health questionnaire.

机构信息

Psychological Medicine Research, University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Center, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cancer. 2011 Jan 1;117(1):218-27. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25514. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.25514
PMID:20737537
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systematic screening for depression has been recommended for patients who have medical conditions like cancer. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is becoming widely used, but its diagnostic accuracy has not yet been tested in a cancer patient population. In this article, the authors report on the performance of the PHQ-9 as a screening instrument for major depressive disorder (MDD) in patients with cancer.

METHODS

Data obtained from a depression screening service for patients who were attending clinics of a Regional Cancer Centre in Edinburgh, United Kingdom were used. Patients had completed both the PHQ-9 and a 2-stage procedure to identify cases of MDD. Performance of the PHQ-9 in identifying cases of MDD was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Data were available on 4264 patients. When scored as a continuous measure, the PHQ-9 performed well with an area under the ROC curve of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.95). A cutoff score of ≥ 8 provided a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI, 89%-95%), a specificity of 81% (95% CI, 80%-82%), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 25%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99% and could be considered optimum in a screening context. The PHQ-9 did not perform as well when it was scored using an algorithm with a sensitivity of 56% (95% CI, 55%-57%), a specificity of 96% (95% CI, 95%-97%), a PPV of 52%, and an NPV of 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

The PHQ-9 scored as a continuous measure with a cutoff score of ≥ 8 performed well in identifying MDD in cancer patients and should be considered as a screening instrument in this population.

摘要

背景

已建议对患有癌症等疾病的患者进行系统性抑郁筛查。9 项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)正被广泛使用,但它在癌症患者人群中的诊断准确性尚未得到检验。本文作者报告了 PHQ-9 作为一种筛查工具在癌症患者中识别重度抑郁症(MDD)的性能。

方法

使用来自英国爱丁堡地区癌症中心诊所就诊的患者的抑郁筛查服务中获得的数据。患者完成了 PHQ-9 和两步程序以识别 MDD 病例。使用接收者操作特征(ROC)分析来确定 PHQ-9 在识别 MDD 病例中的性能。

结果

共获得 4264 名患者的数据。当作为连续测量值评分时,PHQ-9 的表现良好,ROC 曲线下面积为 0.94(95%置信区间[CI],0.93-0.95)。临界值≥8 时,灵敏度为 93%(95%CI,89%-95%),特异性为 81%(95%CI,80%-82%),阳性预测值(PPV)为 25%,阴性预测值(NPV)为 99%,在筛查环境中可以认为是最佳的。使用敏感性为 56%(95%CI,55%-57%)、特异性为 96%(95%CI,95%-97%)、PPV 为 52%和 NPV 为 97%的算法评分时,PHQ-9 的性能较差。

结论

以临界值≥8 评分的连续测量 PHQ-9 能够很好地识别癌症患者中的 MDD,应考虑将其作为该人群的筛查工具。

相似文献

1
Screening for major depression in cancer outpatients: the diagnostic accuracy of the 9-item patient health questionnaire.癌症门诊患者中重度抑郁症的筛查:9 项患者健康问卷的诊断准确性。
Cancer. 2011 Jan 1;117(1):218-27. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25514. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
2
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as screening instruments for depression in patients with cancer.医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和9项患者健康问卷(PHQ - 9)作为癌症患者抑郁的筛查工具。
Cancer. 2017 Nov 1;123(21):4236-4243. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30846. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Screening for depression in cancer patients using the PHQ-9: The accuracy of somatic compared to non-somatic items.使用 PHQ-9 对癌症患者进行抑郁筛查:躯体与非躯体项目的准确性比较。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jul 1;254:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.026. Epub 2019 May 13.
4
Detecting recurrent major depressive disorder within primary care rapidly and reliably using short questionnaire measures.在初级保健中快速可靠地检测复发性重度抑郁症,使用简短的问卷测量方法。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Jan;64(618):e31-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X676438.
5
What is the best screening test for depression in chronic spinal pain patients?慢性脊柱疼痛患者抑郁症的最佳筛查测试是什么?
Spine J. 2014 Jul 1;14(7):1175-82. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.037. Epub 2013 Nov 10.
6
The diagnostic accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for detecting major depression: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses.患者健康问卷-2(PHQ-2)、患者健康问卷-8(PHQ-8)和患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)用于检测重度抑郁症的诊断准确性:系统评价与个体患者数据荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 27;3:124. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-124.
7
The Validity and Reliability of the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 on Screening for Major Depression in Spanish Speaking Immigrants in Chile: A Cross-Sectional Study.《PHQ-9 和 PHQ-2 在智利西班牙语移民中筛查重度抑郁症的有效性和可靠性:一项横断面研究》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13975. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113975.
8
Screening for depression in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: Feasibility and identification of effective tools in the NRG Oncology RTOG 0841 trial.对接受放疗的癌症患者进行抑郁症筛查:NRG肿瘤学RTOG 0841试验中的可行性及有效工具的识别
Cancer. 2017 Feb 1;123(3):485-493. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29969. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
9
Validation of the PHQ-9 depression scale in Ethiopian cancer patients attending the oncology clinic at Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital.PHQ-9 抑郁量表在提克里蒂安贝萨专科医院肿瘤科就诊的埃塞俄比亚癌症患者中的验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02850-3.
10
A study of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-9 in primary care elderly.一项针对初级保健老年人群中 PHQ-9 诊断准确性的研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Sep 1;11:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-63.

引用本文的文献

1
Advance care planning for adults with cancer.癌症成年患者的预先护理规划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 30;7(7):CD016227. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016227.
2
Spiritual wellbeing and psychiatric comorbidity among patients with advanced-stage solid tumor cancer.晚期实体肿瘤癌症患者的精神健康状况与精神疾病共病情况
Indian J Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;67(6):591-599. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_867_24. Epub 2025 May 16.
3
: Examining Technology-Enhanced Collaborative Care Management of Depression in the Cancer Setting.
审视癌症环境中抑郁症的技术强化协作护理管理。
Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2025 May;9(2). doi: 10.1145/3711060. Epub 2025 May 2.
4
Exploring Patient-Related Contextual Factors and Personal Reflections About the Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Intervention for Adults With Advanced Cancer in Metropolitan and Non-Metropolitan Southern Alberta: A Mixed Methods Study.探索与患者相关的背景因素以及对阿尔伯塔省南部大都市和非大都市地区晚期癌症成人患者的癌症管理与有意义生活(CALM)干预措施的个人思考:一项混合方法研究。
Psychooncology. 2025 Jan;34(1):e70067. doi: 10.1002/pon.70067.
5
Psychological Distress in Patients With Asbestos-Related Diseases and Their Families: A Systematic Literature Review.石棉相关疾病患者及其家属的心理困扰:一项系统文献综述
Psychooncology. 2025 Jan;34(1):e70051. doi: 10.1002/pon.70051.
6
Fatigue, impaired physical function and mental health in cancer survivors: the role of social isolation.癌症幸存者的疲劳、身体功能受损及心理健康:社会隔离的作用。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Dec 11;33(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09075-0.
7
Associations of nutrition impact symptoms with depression in patients with advanced cancer.营养相关症状与晚期癌症患者抑郁的相关性。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 19;32(7):445. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08645-6.
8
Unrealistic expectations and disclosure of incurability in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌患者不切实际的期望和无法治愈的披露。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 10;32(7):421. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08630-z.
9
Impact of Environmental Uncertainty on Depression and Anxiety Among Chinese Workers: A Moderated Mediation Model.环境不确定性对中国工人抑郁和焦虑的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 May 2;17:1867-1880. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S455891. eCollection 2024.
10
Optimizing smartphone psychotherapy for depressive symptoms in patients with cancer: Multiphase optimization strategy using a decentralized multicenter randomized clinical trial (J-SUPPORT 2001 Study).优化智能手机在癌症患者抑郁症状中的心理治疗作用:使用去中心化多中心随机临床试验的多阶段优化策略(J-SUPPORT 2001 研究)。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Jun;78(6):353-361. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13657. Epub 2024 Mar 11.