Suppr超能文献

第七版美国癌症联合委员会/国际抗癌联盟胃癌腺癌分类与第六版分类的比较评估。

Evaluation of the seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with the sixth classification.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;116(24):5592-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25550. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The seventh TNM staging system for gastric cancer of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) had a more detailed classification than the sixth TNM staging system for both the tumor (T) and lymph nodes (N). The authors compared survival rates assessed by the seventh staging system with those by the sixth system.

METHODS

The authors analyzed the prospectively collected database on patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery at Seoul National University Hospital between 1986 and 2006, and calculated the survival rates of 9998 cases with primary cancer, R0 resection, and >14 retrieved lymph nodes.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative survival rates (5YSR) according to the seventh edition T or N classifications were significantly different. The 5YSR according to seventh edition of the TNM staging system were 95.1% (stage IA), 88.4% (stage IB), 84.0% (stage IIA), 71.7% (stage IIB), 58.4% (stage IIIA), 41.3% (stage IIIB), and 26.1% (stage IIIC), which were significantly different from each other. The 5YSR of the seventh edition T2 and T3 classifications had significant differences in patients with every N classification, and the 5YSR of seventh edition N1 and N2 classifications had significant differences in T2 patients, T3 patients, and T4 patients. Each stage in the sixth edition was divided into the seventh edition stage with different survival rates. In addition, the number of homogenous groupings in seventh edition TNM stages was increased from 1 to 2.

CONCLUSIONS

The seventh system provided a more detailed classification of prognosis than the sixth system, especially between T2 and T3 tumors and N1 and N2 tumors, although further studies were found to be needed for the N3a and N3b classification.

摘要

背景

美国癌症联合委员会/国际抗癌联盟(AJCC/UICC)的第七版胃癌 TNM 分期系统较第六版在肿瘤(T)和淋巴结(N)方面的分类更为详细。作者比较了第七版分期系统评估的生存率与第六版分期系统评估的生存率。

方法

作者分析了 1986 年至 2006 年期间在首尔国立大学医院接受手术的胃癌患者前瞻性收集的数据库,并计算了 9998 例原发性癌症、R0 切除和>14 个可检索淋巴结患者的生存率。

结果

根据第七版 T 或 N 分类的 5 年累积生存率(5YSR)差异有统计学意义。根据第七版 TNM 分期系统,5YSR 为 95.1%(IA 期)、88.4%(IB 期)、84.0%(IIA 期)、71.7%(IIB 期)、58.4%(IIIA 期)、41.3%(IIIB 期)和 26.1%(IIIC 期),各期之间差异有统计学意义。第七版 T2 和 T3 分类在每个 N 分类的患者中,5YSR 差异有统计学意义,第七版 N1 和 N2 分类在 T2 患者、T3 患者和 T4 患者中,5YSR 差异有统计学意义。第六版的每个分期都分为第七版具有不同生存率的分期。此外,第七版 TNM 分期的同质分组数量从 1 个增加到 2 个。

结论

与第六版相比,第七版系统提供了更详细的预后分类,特别是在 T2 和 T3 肿瘤以及 N1 和 N2 肿瘤之间,尽管需要进一步研究 N3a 和 N3b 分类。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验