• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国胃癌第 6 版与第 7 版 AJCC TNM 分期比较。

Comparison of 6th and 7th AJCC TNM staging classification for carcinoma of the stomach in China.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul;18(7):1869-76. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1542-x. Epub 2011 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-010-1542-x
PMID:21246404
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 7th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (AJCC TNM) staging system was put into use recently. The study aimed to evaluate its predictive ability on survival and compare the difference between the 6th and 7th editions of AJCC TNM system in gastric carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1000 gastric carcinoma patients receiving treatment in our center were selected for the analysis. Patients were staged using both the 6th and 7th editions AJCC TNM staging system. Survival analysis was performed with a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Of previous stage IV patients, 39.9% (112 of 281) migrated to a lower tier in the 7th edition. By setting the cutoff of positive lymph nodes as 0, 2, 6, and 15, the 7th edition strengthens the role of positive lymph nodes. Multivariable regression analysis showed that both 6th and 7th TNM stage systems were independent factors for overall survival. For lymph nodes negative patients, the 5-year overall survival for patients with fewer than 15 resected lymph nodes was significantly lower than those with more than 15.

CONCLUSIONS

AJCC 7th is not superior to AJCC 6th in predicting the 5-year overall survival rates of gastric adenocarcinoma patients. The definition of stage IV and the selection of cutoffs for MLNC in the AJCC 7th system is much more reasonable compared with the AJCC 6th system.

摘要

背景

最近,第 7 版美国癌症联合委员会肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(AJCC TNM)分期系统开始使用。本研究旨在评估其对生存的预测能力,并比较胃癌中第 6 版和第 7 版 AJCC TNM 系统的差异。

材料和方法

本研究共纳入 1000 例在我院接受治疗的胃癌患者进行分析。患者采用第 6 版和第 7 版 AJCC TNM 分期系统进行分期。采用 Cox 回归模型进行生存分析。

结果

在以前的第 IV 期患者中,39.9%(281 例中的 112 例)在第 7 版中降期。通过将阳性淋巴结的截断值设置为 0、2、6 和 15,第 7 版增强了阳性淋巴结的作用。多变量回归分析显示,第 6 版和第 7 版 TNM 分期系统均为总生存的独立因素。对于淋巴结阴性的患者,少于 15 个切除淋巴结的患者 5 年总生存率明显低于多于 15 个淋巴结的患者。

结论

与第 6 版相比,第 7 版 AJCC 在预测胃腺癌患者 5 年总生存率方面并不优越。第 7 版 AJCC 中 IV 期的定义和 MLNC 的截断值选择比第 6 版更加合理。

相似文献

1
Comparison of 6th and 7th AJCC TNM staging classification for carcinoma of the stomach in China.中国胃癌第 6 版与第 7 版 AJCC TNM 分期比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul;18(7):1869-76. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1542-x. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
2
Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system in patients with resected esophageal carcinoma.比较第 6 版和第 7 版美国癌症联合委员会肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期系统在食管癌切除患者中的应用。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;89(4):1024-31. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.01.017.
3
Evaluation of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results from a Chinese monoinstitutional study.评估第七版美国癌症联合委员会胃癌 TNM 分期系统:来自中国单机构研究的结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(6):1918-27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2206-1. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
4
Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.比较新旧(第 6 版和第 7 版)TNM 分类在晚期胃癌中的分期。
Anticancer Res. 2011 Jun;31(6):2361-5.
5
Suitability of 7th UICC N stage for predicting the overall survival of gastric cancer patients after curative resection in China.第七版 UICC N 分期系统对中国胃癌根治术后患者总生存预测的适用性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 May;17(5):1259-66. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0939-x. Epub 2010 Mar 9.
6
Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.聚焦于“N”参数相关生存率的AJCC/UICC胃癌TNM分期系统第6版与第7版比较:意大利单中心NodUs研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul 16;13:215. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0633-3.
7
Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems.上颌窦癌的治疗:1997年与1977年美国癌症联合委员会分期系统的比较
Cancer. 1999 Nov 1;86(9):1700-11.
8
[Preliminary experience of clinical applications of the 7th UICC-AJCC TNM staging system of esophageal carcinoma].[国际抗癌联盟(UICC)-美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第7版食管癌TNM分期系统的临床应用初步经验]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Jun;34(6):461-4. doi: 10. 3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.06.013.
9
Use of the proposals of the international association for the study of lung cancer in the forthcoming edition of lung cancer staging system to predict long-term prognosis of operated patients.采用国际肺癌研究协会的建议,对即将发布的肺癌分期系统进行修订,以预测手术患者的长期预后。
Cancer J. 2010 Mar-Apr;16(2):176-81. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181ce474e.
10
Prognostic value and clinical relevance of the 6th Edition 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma.2002年美国癌症联合委员会第6版分期系统对可切除肝细胞癌患者的预后价值及临床意义
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Oct;203(4):426-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.030. Epub 2006 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative early-stage lung cancer patients and local brain area changes: a cross-sectional observational descriptive study.术前早期肺癌患者与局部脑区变化:一项横断面观察性描述性研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 14;15:1417668. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417668. eCollection 2024.
2
A 9‑gene expression signature to predict stage development in resectable stomach adenocarcinoma.用于预测可切除胃腺癌分期发展的 9 基因表达特征。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Oct 14;22(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02510-8.
3
Survival prediction of stomach cancer using expression data and deep learning models with histopathological images.
利用表达数据和具有组织病理学图像的深度学习模型进行胃癌生存预测。
Cancer Sci. 2023 Feb;114(2):690-701. doi: 10.1111/cas.15592. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
4
Elevated Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein Is a Significant Prognostic Factor for Patients with Gastric Cancer: Results Based on a Large-Scale Retrospective Study.血清甲胎蛋白升高是胃癌患者的重要预后因素:基于大规模回顾性研究的结果
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 29;12:901061. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.901061. eCollection 2022.
5
The New American Joint Committee on Cancer T staging system for stomach: increased complexity without clear improvement in predictive accuracy for endoscopic ultrasound.美国癌症联合委员会新的胃癌 T 分期系统:预测准确性虽有提高,但内镜超声的复杂性也相应增加。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 11;21(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01558-8.
6
Role of Systemic Treatment for Advanced/Metastatic Gastric Carcinoma in the Third-Line Setting: A Bayesian Network Analysis.三线治疗中全身治疗对晚期/转移性胃癌的作用:贝叶斯网络分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Apr 23;10:513. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00513. eCollection 2020.
7
More attention should be paid to adult gastric cancer patients younger than 35 years old: extremely poor prognosis was found.应更加关注35岁以下的成年胃癌患者:发现其预后极差。
J Cancer. 2019 Jan 1;10(2):472-478. doi: 10.7150/jca.27517. eCollection 2019.
8
The effects of Tim-3 activation on T-cells in gastric cancer progression.Tim-3激活对胃癌进展中T细胞的影响。
Oncol Lett. 2019 Feb;17(2):1461-1466. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9743. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
9
A modified subclassification to evaluate the survival of patients with N3 gastric cancer: an international database study.改良的亚分类评估 N3 期胃癌患者的生存:国际数据库研究。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5187-7.
10
Advanced gastric cancer: the value of surgery.进展期胃癌:手术的价值
Acta Biomed. 2018 Dec 17;89(8-S):110-116. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i8-S.7897.