Warfighter Science, Technology and Applied Research United States Army Natick Soldier Research Development and Engineering Center, Natick, Massachusetts 01760, USA.
Am J Hum Biol. 2010 Sep-Oct;22(5):695-701. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21069.
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of utilizing three dimensional whole body laser surface scanning (3DS) to obtain specific anthropometric measurements to estimate percent body fat (BF).
Percent BF estimates from 37 male volunteers, of age 18-62 yr, were determined by inputting manual anthropometric (MA) and 3DS anthropometric measurements into the current Army BF prediction equation for males. The results were compared with each other and to BF values from Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), employed as a reference method.
Mean percent BF estimates (+/-SD) derived from MA, 3DS and from DXA were 18.4(+/-3.8), 18.8(+/-3.9), and 18.9(+/-4.7), respectively. Analysis of Variance tests revealed no statistical difference between the mean values. Correlation analysis comparing MA and 3DS derived percent BF estimates to each other and to those measured by DXA revealed moderate to strong Pearson correlation coefficients (r), small to moderate standard errors of the estimate (SEE), and were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Correlation coefficients and SEE results for this sample were: (1) DXA vs 3DS; r = 0.74, SEE = 3.2, (2) MA vs DXA; r = 0.82, SEE = 2.8, and (3) MA vs 3DS; r = 0.96, SEE = 1.0. Lin's concordance analysis, including Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA), revealed statistically significant measurement agreement among the three measurement modalities (p < 0.05). The application of 3DS scanning to estimate percent BF from commonly used anthropometric measurements are in close agreement with BF estimates derived from analogous MA measurements and from DXA scanning.
本研究旨在评估使用三维全身激光表面扫描(3DS)获取特定人体测量学数据来估算体脂百分比(BF)的可行性。
通过将手动人体测量学(MA)和 3DS 人体测量学测量值输入当前男性 BF 预测方程,确定 37 名年龄在 18-62 岁的男性志愿者的 BF 估计值。将结果相互比较,并与双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)的 BF 值进行比较,DXA 作为参考方法。
MA、3DS 和 DXA 得出的平均 BF 估计值(+/-SD)分别为 18.4(+/-3.8)、18.8(+/-3.9)和 18.9(+/-4.7)。方差分析检验表明平均值之间没有统计学差异。对 MA 和 3DS 衍生的 BF 估计值之间以及与 DXA 测量值之间的相关性分析显示,皮尔逊相关系数(r)为中度至强,估计标准误差(SEE)为小至中,且具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。
对于该样本,相关系数和 SEE 结果为:(1)DXA 与 3DS;r=0.74,SEE=3.2,(2)MA 与 DXA;r=0.82,SEE=2.8,(3)MA 与 3DS;r=0.96,SEE=1.0。林氏一致性分析,包括 Bland-Altman 协议范围(LOA),显示三种测量方式之间存在统计学上显著的测量一致性(p<0.05)。3DS 扫描应用于从常用人体测量学数据估算 BF 的应用与从类似 MA 测量和 DXA 扫描得出的 BF 估计值密切一致。