Suppr超能文献

颈静脉穿刺与静脉导管采集成年马血液的血液学和生化学结果比较。

Comparison of hematologic and biochemical results on blood obtained by jugular venipuncture as compared with intravenous catheter in adult horses.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA.

出版信息

J Vet Intern Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;24(6):1462-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0582.x. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During hospitalization, horses typically undergo frequent blood sampling for diagnostic testing and monitoring. The need for numerous samples in hospitalized horses makes acquisition from an intravenous catheter (IVC) both convenient and less stressful to the patient.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in the plasma chemistry and CBC variables from blood samples obtained from a jugular catheter as compared with direct jugular venipuncture.

ANIMALS

Fifty adult hospitalized horses; 25 receiving constant rate crystalloid therapy, and 25 receiving low volume IV medication.

METHODS

This study was conducted using a prospective, blinded, cross-over design. Samples were obtained sequentially by direct venipuncture of the jugular vein and aspiration from an IVC in the contralateral vein after an appropriate presample of blood was obtained and discarded. Samples were submitted for blinded analysis including CBC, plasma chemistry analysis, stall side plasma glucose concentration, PCV, and total protein concentration. Data obtained were analyzed using a Student's t-test with compensation for unequal variances between the 2 groups. Analyses were Bonferroni corrected for a 5% 2-tailed hypothesis test.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences associated with sampling method (venipuncture versus catheter) regardless of fluid administration status in any of the 24 analytes measured.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Blood samples obtained by IVC have clinically equivalent values to those taken by direct venipuncture in commonly performed analyses. Additional investigation is warranted to establish if this technique is associated with increased complications such as phlebitis or bacteremia.

摘要

背景

在住院期间,马通常需要频繁采集血液样本进行诊断测试和监测。由于住院马需要采集大量样本,因此从静脉导管(IVC)采集样本既方便又能减少对患者的压力。

假设

我们假设从颈静脉导管获得的血液样本与直接颈静脉穿刺相比,其血浆化学和全血细胞计数(CBC)变量没有显著差异。

动物

50 匹成年住院马;25 匹接受持续速率晶体液治疗,25 匹接受低容量静脉内药物治疗。

方法

本研究采用前瞻性、盲法、交叉设计进行。在适当的预采样和丢弃血液后,通过直接静脉穿刺颈静脉和从对侧静脉的 IVC 抽吸,依次获得样本。对样本进行盲法分析,包括全血细胞计数、血浆化学分析、马厩侧血浆葡萄糖浓度、PCV 和总蛋白浓度。使用学生 t 检验分析数据,并对两组之间方差不均等进行补偿。分析采用 Bonferroni 校正,以进行 5%双侧假设检验。

结果

无论液体管理状态如何,在 24 个测量分析物中,与采样方法(静脉穿刺与导管)相关的差异均无统计学意义或无临床意义。

结论和临床意义

通过 IVC 采集的血液样本与直接静脉穿刺采集的样本在常见的分析中具有临床等效值。需要进一步研究以确定该技术是否与静脉炎或菌血症等并发症增加相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验