Ozdamar O, Delgado R E, Eilers R E, Widen J E
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.
Ear Hear. 1990 Dec;11(6):417-29. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199012000-00003.
On-line computer methods were developed and evaluated for automated hearing testing with auditory brain stem responses (ABR). The system contained (1) a response recognition unit which recognized the presence or absence of an ABR response and (2) a threshold tracking unit which adjusted stimulus intensity and determined the ABR threshold. Two methods, one nontemplate (variance ratio) and one template (cross-correlation), were evaluated for response recognition while three threshold tracking methods were explored: clinical, Békésy, and PEST (parameter estimation by sequential testing). Both response recognition and threshold tracking units were evaluated by computer simulations for on-line operation using a standard set of experimentally recorded ABRs. The results indicated that while all the response recognition methods were reasonably accurate, their on-line use resulted in significant differences in test efficiency due to differences in tracking methods.
开发并评估了用于通过听性脑干反应(ABR)进行自动听力测试的在线计算机方法。该系统包括:(1)一个反应识别单元,用于识别ABR反应的有无;(2)一个阈值跟踪单元,用于调整刺激强度并确定ABR阈值。评估了两种用于反应识别的方法,一种是非模板法(方差比),一种是模板法(互相关),同时探索了三种阈值跟踪方法:临床法、贝凯西法和PEST法(顺序测试参数估计法)。反应识别单元和阈值跟踪单元均通过计算机模拟,使用一组标准的实验记录ABR进行在线操作评估。结果表明,虽然所有反应识别方法都相当准确,但由于跟踪方法的差异,它们的在线使用导致测试效率存在显著差异。