Suppr超能文献

全州范围内结肠切除术后手术部位感染的评估:口服抗生素的作用。

A statewide assessment of surgical site infection following colectomy: the role of oral antibiotics.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5331, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2010 Sep;252(3):514-9; discussion 519-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f244f8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utility of adding oral nonabsorbable antibiotics to the bowel prep prior to elective colon surgery.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Bowel preparation prior to colectomy remains controversial. We hypothesized that mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics (compared with without) was associated with lower rates of surgical site infection (SSI).

METHODS

Twenty-four Michigan hospitals participated in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative-Colectomy Best Practices Project. Standard perioperative data, bowel preparation process measures, and Clostridium difficile colitis outcomes were prospectively collected. Among patients receiving mechanical bowel preparation, a logistic regression model generated a propensity score that allowed us to match cases differing only in whether or not they had received oral antibiotics.

RESULTS

Overall, 2011 elective colectomies were performed over 16 months. Mechanical bowel prep without oral antibiotics was administered to 49.6% of patients, whereas 36.4% received a mechanical prep and oral antibiotics. Propensity analysis created 370 paired cases (differing only in receiving oral antibiotics). Patients receiving oral antibiotics were less likely to have any SSI (4.5% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.0001), to have an organ space infection (1.8% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.044) and to have a superficial SSI (2.6% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.001). Patients receiving bowel prep with oral antibiotics were also less likely to have a prolonged ileus (3.9% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.011) and had similar rates of C. difficile colitis (1.3% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients in Michigan receive mechanical bowel preparation prior to elective colectomy. Oral antibiotics may reduce the incidence of SSI.

摘要

目的

确定在择期结肠手术前在肠道准备中添加口服非吸收抗生素的效用。

背景资料摘要

结肠切除术的肠道准备仍然存在争议。我们假设与不使用(相比)机械肠道准备加用口服抗生素与较低的手术部位感染(SSI)率相关。

方法

24 家密歇根州医院参与了密歇根手术质量协作-结肠最佳实践项目。前瞻性收集标准围手术期数据、肠道准备过程测量值和艰难梭菌结肠炎结果。在接受机械肠道准备的患者中,使用逻辑回归模型生成倾向评分,使我们能够仅匹配接受或未接受口服抗生素的病例。

结果

总体而言,在 16 个月内进行了 2011 例择期结肠切除术。49.6%的患者接受了无口服抗生素的机械肠道准备,而 36.4%的患者接受了机械准备和口服抗生素。倾向分析创建了 370 对病例(仅在接受口服抗生素方面存在差异)。接受口服抗生素的患者发生任何 SSI 的可能性较小(4.5%比 11.8%,P=0.0001)、发生器官间隙感染的可能性较小(1.8%比 4.2%,P=0.044)、发生浅表 SSI 的可能性较小(2.6%比 7.6%,P=0.001)。接受口服肠道准备的患者发生延长性肠梗阻的可能性也较小(3.9%比 8.6%,P=0.011),艰难梭菌结肠炎的发生率相似(1.3%比 1.8%,P=0.58)。

结论

密歇根州的大多数患者在择期结肠切除术前接受机械肠道准备。口服抗生素可能会降低 SSI 的发生率。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
How to prevent postoperative ileus in colorectal surgery? a systematic review.如何预防结直肠手术中的术后肠梗阻?一项系统评价。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Aug 1;85(9):4501-4508. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001099. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
Statewide Clinic Registries: The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative.全州诊所登记处:密歇根外科质量协作组织
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Jan;32(1):16-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673350. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

2
Don't give up on bowel preps-yet.先别放弃肠道准备。
Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):200; author reply 200-1. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e48d2f.
7
Nationwide volume and mortality after elective surgery in cirrhotic patients.肝硬化患者择期手术后的全国手术量及死亡率
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jan;208(1):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验