Hemling M E, Roberts G D, Johnson W, Carr S A, Covey T R
Department of Physical and Structural Chemistry, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406-0939.
Biomed Environ Mass Spectrom. 1990 Nov;19(11):677-91. doi: 10.1002/bms.1200191107.
A comparison of continuous-flow fast atom bombardment (FAB) mass spectrometry and nebulization-assisted electrospray for analysis of proteins and glycoproteins by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/mass spectrometry is presented. The evaluation was made using enzymatic digests of recombinant soluble CD4 glycoprotein and recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen and a mixture of HPLC retention standard peptides. These samples were analyzed by reversed-phase HPLC on a microbore (1 x 100 mm C18) gradient HPLC system with 10% or 20% of the eluent containing approximately 20-100 pmol of the sample directed into the continuous-flow FAB mass spectrometric or electrospray mass spectrometric source, respectively. The techniques were evaluated on the criteria of chromatographic integrity, ease of data analysis, protein sequence coverage, discrimination effects, ability to detect glycopeptides, simplicity of operation, and sensitivity. Both techniques produce useful peptide molecular weight data from comparable amounts of sample injected. However, the nebulization-assisted electrospray system is capable of yielding higher peptide mapping coverages with the least sample consumed in toto due in part to the wider mass ranges resulting from the multicharging effect and to the ability to detect glycopeptides. Under the experimental conditions employed here no fragmentation was observed in the electrospray mass spectra. In contrast, significant, sequence informative fragmentation was occasionally observed for peptides in the continuous-flow FAB mass spectral data.
本文介绍了连续流快原子轰击(FAB)质谱法与雾化辅助电喷雾法在通过高效液相色谱(HPLC)/质谱法分析蛋白质和糖蛋白方面的比较。使用重组可溶性CD4糖蛋白和重组乙肝表面抗原的酶解产物以及HPLC保留标准肽混合物进行了评估。这些样品在微径(1×100 mm C18)梯度HPLC系统上通过反相HPLC进行分析,分别将含有约20 - 100 pmol样品的10%或20%洗脱液导入连续流FAB质谱源或电喷雾质谱源。根据色谱完整性、数据分析的难易程度、蛋白质序列覆盖率、鉴别效果、检测糖肽的能力、操作的简便性和灵敏度等标准对这些技术进行了评估。两种技术都能从注入的相当量样品中产生有用的肽分子量数据。然而,雾化辅助电喷雾系统能够以最少的总样品消耗量获得更高的肽图谱覆盖率,部分原因是多重电荷效应导致的更宽质量范围以及检测糖肽的能力。在本文采用的实验条件下,电喷雾质谱图中未观察到碎片化现象。相比之下,在连续流FAB质谱数据中偶尔会观察到肽的明显的、提供序列信息的碎片化现象。