Centre for Nano Safety, School of Life Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
Nanotoxicology. 2010 Jun;4(2):139-49. doi: 10.3109/17435390903276925.
The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of a series of different surface-coated quantum dots (QDs) to cause oxidative stress and affect cell signalling in J774.A1 macrophages. Organic QDs caused a significant (p < 0.001) decrease in glutathione (GSH) levels over 24 h, while COOH and NH(2) (PEG) QDs induced a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in GSH at 6 and 24 h only. J774.A1 cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration significantly increased (p < 0.01) 30 min after treatment with all QDs. Trolox was, however, able to prevent the COOH and NH(2) (PEG) QD-induced Ca(2+) signal, but not the organic QD induced effect. All QDs tested were observed to have a relatively low ability to stimulate increased expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). In conclusion, QDs differ in their interactions with macrophages according to their specific surface properties.
本研究旨在探究一系列不同表面涂层量子点(QD)引发氧化应激和影响 J774.A1 巨噬细胞信号转导的能力。有机 QD 在 24 小时内显著降低了(p < 0.001)谷胱甘肽(GSH)水平,而 COOH 和 NH(2)(PEG)QD 仅在 6 和 24 小时降低了 GSH(p < 0.05)。与所有 QD 处理后 30 分钟,J774.A1 细胞质 Ca(2+)浓度显著增加(p < 0.01)。然而,Trolox 能够防止 COOH 和 NH(2)(PEG)QD 诱导的 Ca(2+)信号,但不能阻止有机 QD 诱导的效应。所测试的所有 QD 都被观察到具有相对较低的刺激促炎细胞因子肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)表达增加的能力。总之,根据其特定的表面特性,QD 与巨噬细胞的相互作用存在差异。