Section of Ecology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Plant Ecological Genetics, Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH-Zürich, ETH-Zentrum, Zürich, Switzerland.
J Evol Biol. 2010 Oct;23(10):2185-2196. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02077.x. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
Information of the patterns of genetic variation in plant resistance and tolerance against herbivores and genetic trade-offs between these two defence strategies is central for our understanding of the evolution of plant defence. We found genetic variation in resistance to two specialist herbivores and in tolerance to artificial damage but not to a specialist leaf herbivore in a long-lived perennial herb. Seedlings tended to have genetic variation in tolerance to artificial damage. Genetic variation in tolerance of adult plants to artificial damage was not consistent in time. Our results suggest that the level of genetic variation in tolerance and resistance depends on plant life-history stage, type of damage and timing of estimating the tolerance relative to the occurrence of the damage, which might reflect the pattern of selection imposed by herbivory. Furthermore, we found no trade-offs between resistance and tolerance, which suggests that the two defence strategies can evolve independently.
有关植物对草食动物的抗性和耐受性的遗传变异模式以及这两种防御策略之间的遗传权衡的信息,对于我们理解植物防御的进化至关重要。我们在一种长寿的多年生草本植物中发现了对两种专食性草食动物的抗性和对人工损伤的耐受性的遗传变异,但对专食性叶食草动物的抗性和耐受性没有遗传变异。幼苗对人工损伤的耐受性往往具有遗传变异。成年植株对人工损伤的耐受性的遗传变异在时间上并不一致。我们的研究结果表明,对人工损伤的耐受性和抗性的遗传变异水平取决于植物的生活史阶段、损伤类型以及相对于损伤发生的时间来估计耐受性的时间,这可能反映了草食性造成的选择模式。此外,我们没有发现抗性和耐受性之间存在权衡,这表明这两种防御策略可以独立进化。