Suppr超能文献

症状性颈动脉狭窄早期颈动脉内膜切除术的风险。

Risk of early carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

机构信息

Mayo Medical School, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn 55906, USA.

出版信息

Stroke. 2010 Oct;41(10):2186-90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.590711. Epub 2010 Aug 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the rate of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death in patients undergoing early and late carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after a symptomatic event and in asymptomatic patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all CEAs performed in the Department of Neurosurgery between January 2004 and May 2009. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Group 1, asymptomatic patients; Group 2, symptomatic patients operated on >2 weeks after their transient ischemic attack or stroke; and Group 3, symptomatic patients operated on ≤2 weeks of their transient ischemic attack or stroke. Primary outcomes were any myocardial infarction, stroke, or death occurring within 30 days postoperatively. The secondary end point was transient ischemic attack within 30 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

Five hundred thirty-two CEAs were performed on 507 patients during the study period. Thirty-day follow-up was available for 500 patients with 525 CEAs. Groups 1, 2, and 3 consisted of 278, 105, and 142 CEAs, respectively. In total, 12 patients had primary outcomes. In Group 1, 5 patients had primary outcomes of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death (1.8%); in Group 2, 1 patient had primary outcomes (1.0%); and in Group 3, 6 patients had primary outcomes (4.2%). There was no significant difference in the rate of primary outcomes among the 3 groups (P=0.17) or when Groups 2 and 3 were compared (P=0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the perioperative risk of transient ischemic attacks, stroke, death, and myocardial infarction is slightly higher in symptomatic patients operated on early, CEA can be done with an acceptable risk in properly selected symptomatic patients within 2 weeks of their transient ischemic attack or stroke.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在确定和比较症状性事件后行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的早期和晚期患者以及无症状患者的卒中、心肌梗死和死亡发生率。

方法

我们对 2004 年 1 月至 2009 年 5 月神经外科行 CEA 的所有患者进行回顾性分析。患者分为 3 组:第 1 组为无症状患者;第 2 组为症状性患者,短暂性脑缺血发作或卒中后 2 周以上行手术;第 3 组为症状性患者,短暂性脑缺血发作或卒中后 2 周内行手术。主要结局为术后 30 天内任何心肌梗死、卒中或死亡。次要终点为术后 30 天内短暂性脑缺血发作。

结果

在研究期间,507 例患者中有 532 例行 CEA。500 例患者有 525 例 CEA 可进行 30 天随访。第 1、2 和 3 组分别有 278、105 和 142 例 CEA。共有 12 例患者发生主要结局。第 1 组中,5 例患者发生卒中、心肌梗死或死亡(1.8%);第 2 组中,1 例患者发生主要结局(1.0%);第 3 组中,6 例患者发生主要结局(4.2%)。3 组之间的主要结局发生率无显著差异(P=0.17),也无统计学意义(P=0.24)。

结论

尽管在症状性患者中早期行 CEA 手术的围手术期短暂性脑缺血发作、卒中、死亡和心肌梗死的风险略高,但在适当选择的症状性患者中,在短暂性脑缺血发作或卒中后 2 周内行 CEA 可获得可接受的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验