• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作场所健康促进准备情况检查表评估。

Assessment of a Worksite Health Promotion Readiness Checklist.

机构信息

Allied Health Sciences/Health Promotion, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-2101, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Sep;52(9):893-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181efb84d.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181efb84d
PMID:20798646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9753940/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of a Worksite Health Promotion Readiness Checklist (WRCL) designed to evaluate the worksite's readiness for implementing health promotion and health protection programs.

METHODS

The WRCL was pilot tested in worksites with (WHPy) and without (WHPn) health promotion programs. The two parts of WRCL scores (observational and administrative) for WHPy and WHPn sites were compared within and between the worksites to establish WRCL utility and sensitivity.

RESULTS

Observational WRCL (completed by two observers per site) demonstrated high interrater reliability (P < 0.05) for most items. Administrative WRCL (completed by three administrators per site) showed some discrepant responses between administrators. Overall, both sections of WRCL produced higher scores for WHPy sites.

CONCLUSIONS

WRCL could be a valid and reliable instrument to measure readiness of a worksite toward health promotion and health protection programs.

摘要

目的

评估工作场所健康促进准备情况检查表(WRCL)的实用性,该检查表旨在评估工作场所实施健康促进和健康保护计划的准备情况。

方法

WRCL 在有(WHPy)和没有(WHPn)健康促进计划的工作场所进行了试点测试。对 WHPy 和 WHPn 工作场所的 WRCL 评分的两个部分(观察和管理)进行了内部和内部比较,以确定 WRCL 的实用性和敏感性。

结果

观察性 WRCL(由每个场地的两名观察员完成)对大多数项目的评分具有很高的评分者间可靠性(P<0.05)。管理性 WRCL(由每个场地的三名管理员完成)显示管理员之间的一些不一致反应。总体而言,WRCL 的两个部分都为 WHPy 场地产生了更高的分数。

结论

WRCL 可能是一种有效和可靠的工具,可用于衡量工作场所对健康促进和健康保护计划的准备情况。

相似文献

1
Assessment of a Worksite Health Promotion Readiness Checklist.工作场所健康促进准备情况检查表评估。
J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Sep;52(9):893-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181efb84d.
2
Checklist of Health Promotion Environments at Worksites (CHEW): development and measurement characteristics.工作场所健康促进环境清单(CHEW):开发与测量特征
Am J Health Promot. 2002 May-Jun;16(5):288-99. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-16.5.288.
3
Assessing Organizational Readiness for a Participatory Occupational Health/Health Promotion Intervention in Skilled Nursing Facilities.评估专业护理机构参与式职业健康/健康促进干预的组织准备情况。
Health Promot Pract. 2015 Sep;16(5):724-32. doi: 10.1177/1524839915573945. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
4
A comparison of Omaha worksite health promotion activities to the 1992 national survey with a special perspective on program intervention.将奥马哈工作场所健康促进活动与1992年全国调查进行比较,并特别关注项目干预。
Am J Health Promot. 1995 Nov-Dec;10(2):132-9. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.2.132.
5
Worksite health and safety climate: scale development and effects of a health promotion intervention.工作场所健康与安全氛围:量表开发及健康促进干预的效果
Prev Med. 1998 Jan-Feb;27(1):111-9. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0253.
6
Results of the 2004 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey.2004年全国工作场所健康促进调查结果。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1503-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.100313. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
7
Mental health issues in the workplace: a case for a new managerial approach.职场中的心理健康问题:一种新管理方法的实例
J Occup Environ Med. 2001 Dec;43(12):1073-80. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200112000-00009.
8
Reliability and validity testing of the CDC Worksite Health ScoreCard: an assessment tool to help employers prevent heart disease, stroke, and related health conditions.疾病预防控制中心工作场所健康记分卡的可靠性和有效性测试:一种帮助雇主预防心脏病、中风和相关健康问题的评估工具。
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 May;55(5):520-6. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31828349a7.
9
Planning worksite health promotion programs: models, methods, and design implications.规划工作场所健康促进项目:模式、方法及设计启示
Am J Health Promot. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(6):suppl 1-12, iii following p. 452. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.22.6.tahp-1.
10
We're working hard, but is it hardly working? Why process is critical in the delivery of worksite health promotion programs.我们工作很努力,但成效甚微?为什么在实施工作场所健康促进计划时,流程至关重要。
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 May;55(5):586-92. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182882c17.

引用本文的文献

1
Workplace Integrated Safety and Health Program Uptake in Nursing Homes: Associations with Ownership.工作场所整合安全与健康计划在养老院的采用:与所有权的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 28;18(21):11313. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111313.
2
Intermediary Perspectives on Total Worker Health in Small Businesses.中小企业全员健康的中介视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 2;18(19):10398. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910398.
3
How to ask: Surveying nursing directors of nursing homes.如何提问:对养老院护理主任进行调查。
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 4;4(2):e304. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.304. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Redesign, Field-Testing, and Validation of the Physical Activity Campus Environmental Supports (PACES) Audit.重新设计、现场测试和验证《校园体力活动环境支持(PACES)评估》。
J Environ Public Health. 2019 May 19;2019:5819752. doi: 10.1155/2019/5819752. eCollection 2019.
5
Bilingual Text4Walking Food Service Employee Intervention Pilot Study.双语文本 4:行走式餐饮服务员工干预试点研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 1;4(2):e68. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5328.
6
Participatory action research in corrections: The HITEC 2 program.惩教领域的参与式行动研究:HITEC 2项目。
Appl Ergon. 2016 Mar;53 Pt A(Pt A):169-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
7
Review of measures of worksite environmental and policy supports for physical activity and healthy eating.工作场所对身体活动和健康饮食的环境及政策支持措施综述。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 May 7;12:E65. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140410.
8
Healthy workplaces? A survey of Massachusetts employers.健康的工作场所?马萨诸塞州雇主调查。
Am J Health Promot. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(6):390-400. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.110216-QUAN-72. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
9
Workplace health promotion implementation, readiness, and capacity among midsize employers in low-wage industries: a national survey.低薪行业中型雇主的工作场所健康促进实施、准备情况和能力:一项全国性调查。
J Occup Environ Med. 2012 Nov;54(11):1337-43. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182717cf2.

本文引用的文献

1
A conceptual framework for integrating workplace health promotion and occupational ergonomics programs.整合工作场所健康促进与职业工效学计划的概念框架。
Public Health Rep. 2009 Jul-Aug;124 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):16-25. doi: 10.1177/00333549091244S103.
2
Addressing obesity in the workplace: the role of employers.应对职场中的肥胖问题:雇主的角色。
Milbank Q. 2009 Mar;87(1):101-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00549.x.
3
Development of a community-wide cardiovascular risk reduction assessment tool for small rural employers in upstate New York.为纽约州北部农村地区的小型雇主开发一种全社区范围的心血管疾病风险降低评估工具。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Apr;6(2):A65. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
4
Influencing organisational change in the NHS: lessons learned from workplace wellness initiatives in practice.影响英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的组织变革:从工作场所健康倡议实践中汲取的经验教训。
Qual Prim Care. 2008;16(6):449-55.
5
A new evaluation tool to obtain practice-based evidence of worksite health promotion programs.一种用于获取基于实践的工作场所健康促进项目证据的新评估工具。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Oct;5(4):A118. Epub 2008 Sep 15.
6
Using a return-on-investment estimation model to evaluate outcomes from an obesity management worksite health promotion program.使用投资回报率估算模型评估肥胖管理工作场所健康促进项目的成果。
J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Sep;50(9):981-90. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318184a489.
7
Development of the Environmental Assessment Tool (EAT) to measure organizational physical and social support for worksite obesity prevention programs.开发环境评估工具(EAT)以衡量组织对工作场所肥胖预防计划的物质和社会支持。
J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Feb;50(2):126-37. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318161b42a.
8
Results of the 2004 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey.2004年全国工作场所健康促进调查结果。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1503-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.100313. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
9
Integrating occupational health, safety and worksite health promotion: opportunities for research and practice.整合职业健康、安全与工作场所健康促进:研究与实践的机遇
Med Lav. 2006 Mar-Apr;97(2):240-57.
10
Development of an ecological assessment tool for a workplace physical activity program standard.开发一种用于工作场所身体活动计划标准的生态评估工具。
Health Promot Pract. 2005 Oct;6(4):453-63. doi: 10.1177/1524839904263730.