Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Feb;22(2):551-7. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1297-z. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
Adherence to, and persistence with, treatments for osteoporosis are low. Adherence with teriparatide decreases over time. Higher copayments in the commercial/Medicare population were associated with worse persistence. Understanding factors such as prior screening, prior treatment history, and out of pocket costs that influence persistence with teriparatide may help clinicians make informed decisions.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate adherence and persistence with teriparatide.
Beneficiaries with at least one claim for teriparatide in 2003 or 2004 and continuous enrollment in the previous 12 months and subsequent 6 months were identified in a national commercial/Medicare and Medicaid administrative claims database (MarketScan®). Adherence was assessed through calculation of the medication possession ratio (MPR). Persistence was measured by time until discontinuation and time until first 60-day gap in treatment. Factors associated with persistence were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.
The average MPR at 6 months was 0.74 (N=2,218) and at 12 months, was 0.66 (N=1,303). At 6 months, 64.6% of patients remained on therapy and at 12 months, 56.7% remained. Bone mineral density screening and use of antiresorptive therapy within the 12 months pre-period, and lower patient copayments were associated with increased persistence.
Patients appear to have good adherence with teriparatide over the first 6 months which declines over time. Prior screening and treatment of osteoporosis and out of pocket costs appear to impact persistence. To optimize patient outcomes, clinicians should consider clinical factors that impact persistence, while healthcare decision makers should consider the negative effect of higher patient copayments on persistence.
骨质疏松症治疗的依从性和持久性较低。特立帕肽的依从性随时间的推移而降低。商业/医疗保险人群中的较高共付额与较差的持久性相关。了解影响特立帕肽持久性的因素,如先前的筛查、先前的治疗史和自付费用,可能有助于临床医生做出明智的决策。
本研究的目的是评估特立帕肽的依从性和持久性。
在全国商业/医疗保险和医疗补助管理索赔数据库(MarketScan®)中,确定至少有一次特立帕肽索赔记录且在之前的 12 个月和随后的 6 个月内连续参保的受益人群。通过计算药物持有率(MPR)来评估依从性。通过停止治疗的时间和首次 60 天治疗间隔的时间来衡量持久性。使用 Cox 比例风险模型评估与持久性相关的因素。
6 个月时的平均 MPR 为 0.74(N=2218),12 个月时为 0.66(N=1303)。6 个月时,64.6%的患者仍在接受治疗,12 个月时,56.7%的患者仍在接受治疗。骨密度筛查和在 12 个月前使用抗吸收药物治疗,以及较低的患者共付额与较高的持久性相关。
患者在最初的 6 个月内对特立帕肽的依从性似乎很好,随着时间的推移而下降。先前的骨质疏松症筛查和治疗以及自付费用似乎会影响持久性。为了优化患者的治疗效果,临床医生应该考虑影响持久性的临床因素,而医疗保健决策者应该考虑较高的患者共付额对持久性的负面影响。