Bonafede M M, Shi N, Bower A G, Barron R L, Grauer A, Chandler D B
Life Sciences, Truven Health Analytics, 150 Cambridge Park Dr., Cambridge, MA, 02140, USA,
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Mar;26(3):1203-12. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2971-3. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
The objective of this study was to describe the risk of fragility-related fractures in the 2 years following teriparatide initiation. In an administrative claims analysis of over 11,407 patients, approximately one in eight patients had a new or recurrent fragility-related fracture in the 2 years following teriparatide initiation.
The objective of this study was to describe the risk of fragility-related fractures in the 2 years following the initiation of teriparatide in a real-world setting.
This retrospective study used data from the 2002 to 2011 MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases to identify patients 50 years and older with a diagnosis of osteoporosis (ICD-9-CM code 733.0x) who were initiating teriparatide. Patients were required to have continuous medical and pharmacy benefit coverage for the 12 months prior to and 24 months following teriparatide initiation (index event). Teriparatide treatment patterns (persistence and adherence) were described, as was the use of antiresorptive therapy. The primary study outcome was the presence of a new or recurring fragility fracture following the initiation of teriparatide.
A total of 11,407 patients met the study criteria (mean age = 69.5, standard deviation = 10.6 years; 92.0% female). One in four (25.6%) patients had fragility fracture claims in the year prior to teriparatide initiation, of which 64.0% were on existing antiresorptive therapy. Overall, 13.4% (n = 1527) of patients had a new or recurrent fracture during the 2-year follow-up period. Forty-eight percent of patients on teriparatide treatment were considered persistent; fragility fractures were more common among patients nonpersistent with teriparatide (15.2%) than among those persistent with teriparatide (11.4%). A higher fracture rate (35.7%) was observed in the cohort with previous fragility fracture then those without pre-index fractures (24%).
More than 13.4% of patients had new or recurrent fragility-related fractures during the 2 years following the initiation of teriparatide; these fractures were more in common in patients with pre-existing fractures and the patients who were nonpersistent with teriparatide.
本研究的目的是描述特立帕肽起始治疗后2年内脆性骨折相关的风险。在一项对超过11407名患者的行政索赔分析中,约八分之一的患者在特立帕肽起始治疗后的2年内发生了新的或复发性脆性骨折相关事件。
本研究的目的是描述在现实环境中特立帕肽起始治疗后2年内脆性骨折相关的风险。
这项回顾性研究使用了2002年至2011年市场扫描商业和医疗保险补充数据库的数据,以识别年龄在50岁及以上、诊断为骨质疏松症(国际疾病分类第九版临床修正版代码733.0x)且开始使用特立帕肽的患者。患者在特立帕肽起始治疗前12个月和起始治疗后24个月(索引事件)需要持续享有医疗和药房福利覆盖。描述了特立帕肽的治疗模式(持续性和依从性)以及抗吸收治疗的使用情况。主要研究结果是特立帕肽起始治疗后出现新的或复发性脆性骨折。
共有11407名患者符合研究标准(平均年龄 = 69.5岁,标准差 = 10.6岁;92.0%为女性)。四分之一(25.6%)的患者在开始使用特立帕肽前一年有脆性骨折索赔,其中64.0%正在接受现有的抗吸收治疗。总体而言,13.4%(n = 1527)的患者在2年随访期内发生了新的或复发性骨折。接受特立帕肽治疗的患者中,48%被认为具有持续性;脆性骨折在未持续使用特立帕肽的患者中(15.2%)比持续使用特立帕肽的患者中(11.4%)更常见。与没有索引前骨折的队列相比,有既往脆性骨折的队列中观察到更高的骨折率(35.7%)。
超过13.4%的患者在特立帕肽起始治疗后的2年内发生了新的或复发性脆性骨折相关事件;这些骨折在已有骨折的患者和未持续使用特立帕肽的患者中更为常见。