• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床药理学病例讨论:小组教学方法在大班教学中的应用

Case discussion in clinical pharmacology: application of small group teaching methods to a large group.

作者信息

Stein M, Neill P, Houston S

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Zimbabwe, Avondale, Harare.

出版信息

Med Teach. 1990;12(2):193-6. doi: 10.3109/01421599009006696.

DOI:10.3109/01421599009006696
PMID:2079894
Abstract

Problem-oriented case discussion is a valuable teaching tool in clinical pharmacology. Small groups are ideal for discussion but attempts to extend this to large groups often magnify the problems seen with small group discussion to an unacceptable extent. We describe a format which overcomes many of the problems encountered. The class is divided into groups of six students. Cases for discussion are distributed a week before discussion. Individual groups meet, research, discuss, form a consensus opinion and appoint a chairperson for each topic. The class meets and two groups are randomly chosen to discuss the first topic. The chairperson of the first group briefly presents the group's analysis of the problem. The chairperson of the second group then acts as an 'interrogator', questioning statements of fact, application of knowledge or logic, and offers alternative opinions. After discussion between the two groups the rest of the class join the discussion. Two new groups are chosen for the second case. This format facilitates self-directed learning, well-prepared participants and worthwhile discussion.

摘要

以问题为导向的病例讨论是临床药理学中一种有价值的教学工具。小组讨论很适合,但试图将其扩展到大型团体时,往往会将小组讨论中出现的问题放大到不可接受的程度。我们描述了一种能克服许多所遇到问题的形式。班级被分成六人一组。讨论案例在讨论前一周分发。各个小组碰面、研究、讨论、形成共识意见,并为每个主题指定一名主席。全班集合,随机挑选两组讨论第一个主题。第一组的主席简要介绍小组对问题的分析。然后第二组的主席充当“提问者”,对事实陈述、知识应用或逻辑提出质疑,并提出不同意见。两组讨论后,班级其他成员加入讨论。为第二个案例再挑选两组。这种形式有助于自主学习、参与者充分准备以及进行有价值的讨论。

相似文献

1
Case discussion in clinical pharmacology: application of small group teaching methods to a large group.临床药理学病例讨论:小组教学方法在大班教学中的应用
Med Teach. 1990;12(2):193-6. doi: 10.3109/01421599009006696.
2
Case-oriented self-learning and review in pharmacology teaching.以病例为导向的药理学教学中的自主学习与复习。
Am J Med Sci. 2014 Jul;348(1):52-6. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000197.
3
Teaching clinical pharmacology and therapeutics: selective for fourth-year medical students.临床药理学与治疗学教学:面向医学专业四年级学生的选修课。
J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Aug;38(8):670-9. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04805.x.
4
Development of innovative teaching materials: clinical pharmacology problem-solving (CPPS) units: comparison with patient-oriented problem-solving units and problem-based learning--a 10-year review.创新教材的开发:临床药理学问题解决(CPPS)单元:与以患者为导向的问题解决单元及基于问题的学习的比较——十年回顾
J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 May;42(5):477-91. doi: 10.1177/00912700222011535.
5
Prescription Writing in Small Groups as a Clinical Pharmacology Educational Intervention: Perceptions of Preclerkship Medical Students.小组处方书写作为一种临床药理学教育干预措施:预科医学生的看法
J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Aug;56(8):1028-34. doi: 10.1002/jcph.692. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
6
The case conference approach to teaching clinical pharmacology.临床药理学教学的病例讨论会方法。
J Clin Pharmacol. 1992 Jun;32(6):502-10. doi: 10.1177/009127009203200603.
7
Development of active learning modules in pharmacology for small group teaching.用于小组教学的药理学主动学习模块的开发。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2015 Jan-Apr;28(1):46-51. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.161851.
8
Personal drug selection: problem-based learning in pharmacology: experience from a medical school in Nepal.个人药物选择:药理学中的以问题为基础的学习:来自尼泊尔一所医学院的经验。
PLoS One. 2007 Jun 13;2(6):e524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000524.
9
Revival of the case method: a way to retain student-centred learning in a post-PBL era.案例教学法的复兴:在后基于问题学习时代保持以学生为中心的学习的一种方式。
Med Teach. 2007 Feb;29(1):e32-6. doi: 10.1080/01421590601039968.
10
Survey results of POPS use in United States and Canadian schools of medicine and pharmacy.
J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Feb;35(2):117-27. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1995.tb04999.x.

引用本文的文献

1
An Interactive Process for Delivering Pharmacologic Interventions for Migraine Headache to First-Year Medical Students.为一年级医学生提供偏头痛药物干预的互动过程。
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Feb 7;16:10877. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10877.