• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挣养家者-照顾者模式在十字路口:比较视角下瑞典家庭政策的改革与结果。

Earner-carer model at the crossroads: reforms and outcomes of Sweden's family policy in comparative perspective.

机构信息

Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(3):373-98. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.3.a.

DOI:10.2190/HS.40.3.a
PMID:20799667
Abstract

Following the 2006 election, the Swedish earner-carer model of family policy seems to have come to an important crossroads, and questions have been raised about the future course of policies. Will the prototypical earner-carer model in Sweden persist? The separate reforms in cash transfers, services, and tax systems in several respects seem to point in contradictory directions, simultaneously introducing new principles of social care. In this article, past and present reforms and potential outcomes of policies are discussed from an institutional and comparative perspective. Reviewing research on outcomes of earner-carer policies for gendered patterns of productive and reproductive work, class-based stratification, child well-being, fertility, and work-family conflict, the article also contributes to the discussion about future challenges for family policy institutions in Sweden and other advanced welfare states.

摘要

2006 年选举后,瑞典的养家者照顾者家庭政策模式似乎到了一个重要的十字路口,人们对政策的未来走向提出了质疑。瑞典的典型养家者照顾者模式还会持续吗?现金转移、服务和税收制度方面的单独改革在几个方面似乎指向了相互矛盾的方向,同时引入了新的社会关怀原则。本文从制度和比较的角度讨论了过去和现在的改革以及政策的潜在结果。通过回顾关于养家者照顾者政策对生产性和生殖性工作的性别模式、基于阶级的分层、儿童福利、生育率和工作家庭冲突的结果的研究,本文也为讨论瑞典和其他先进福利国家的家庭政策制度的未来挑战做出了贡献。

相似文献

1
Earner-carer model at the crossroads: reforms and outcomes of Sweden's family policy in comparative perspective.挣养家者-照顾者模式在十字路口:比较视角下瑞典家庭政策的改革与结果。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(3):373-98. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.3.a.
2
Sweden's family policies and roller-coaster fertility.瑞典的家庭政策与像过山车般起伏的生育率
Jinko Mondai Kenkyu. 1996 Nov;52(3-4):1-22.
3
Renovating the Commons: Swedish health care reforms in perspective.重塑公共医疗:瑞典医疗改革透视
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Feb-Apr;30(1-2):253-75. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-1-2-253.
4
Social rights and employment rights related to family care: family care regimes in Europe.与家庭照料相关的社会权利和就业权利:欧洲的家庭照料制度。
J Aging Stud. 2014 Apr;29:66-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2013.12.002. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
5
Informal caregiving for elders in Sweden: an analysis of current policy developments.瑞典老年人的非正式护理:对当前政策发展的分析。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2011 Oct;23(4):335-53. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2011.605630.
6
Population policy in South Africa: a critical perspective.南非的人口政策:批判性视角。
Dev South Afr. 1991 Feb;8(1):19-34. doi: 10.1080/03768359108439567.
7
Structural patterns in Swedish health policy: a 30-year perspective.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2015 Apr;10(2):195-215. doi: 10.1017/S1744133114000292. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
8
Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.终身收入模式、未来社会保障福利的分配以及养老金改革的影响。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(4):74-98.
9
Democratic constraints on demographic policy.民主对人口政策的限制。
Comp Soc Res. 1984;7:387-96.
10
Studying social policy and resilience to adversity in different welfare states: Britain and Sweden.研究不同福利国家(英国和瑞典)的社会政策与逆境适应能力
Int J Health Serv. 2006;36(3):425-42. doi: 10.2190/E9H5-URYL-2W4U-QED6.

引用本文的文献

1
Fathers' Use of Parental Leave and Union Dissolution.父亲休陪产假与工会解散
Eur J Popul. 2019 Jan 30;36(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10680-019-09518-z. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Use It or Save It? Migration Background and Parental Leave Uptake in Sweden.用还是省?瑞典的移民背景与育儿假使用情况
Eur J Popul. 2016 Jan 25;32(2):189-210. doi: 10.1007/s10680-015-9365-x. eCollection 2016 May.
3
How can family policies reconcile fertility and women's employment? Comparisons between South Korea and Sweden.家庭政策如何协调生育与女性就业?韩国与瑞典的比较。
Asian J Women Stud. 2016;22(3):269-288. doi: 10.1080/12259276.2016.1202027. Epub 2016 Aug 3.