• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How can family policies reconcile fertility and women's employment? Comparisons between South Korea and Sweden.家庭政策如何协调生育与女性就业？韩国与瑞典的比较。
Asian J Women Stud. 2016;22(3):269-288. doi: 10.1080/12259276.2016.1202027. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
2
Female labour force participation, fertility and public policy in Sweden.瑞典的女性劳动力参与率、生育率与公共政策
Eur J Popul. 1992;8(3):199-215. doi: 10.1007/BF01797210.
3
Cohort size and female labour supply.队列规模与女性劳动力供给。
Eur J Popul. 1992;8(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/BF01797119.
4
Report examines links among women's equality, smaller families, healthier children.报告探讨了妇女平等、家庭规模缩小与儿童健康之间的联系。
Popul Today. 1997 Jun;25(6):1-2.
5
Intercountry comparisons of labor force trends and of related developments: an overview.劳动力趋势及相关发展的国家间比较：概述
J Labor Econ. 1985 Jan;3(1 Pt 2):S1-32. doi: 10.1086/298074.
6
Influence of macrosocial policies on women's health and gender inequalities in health.宏观社会政策对妇女健康和健康性别不平等的影响。
Epidemiol Rev. 2014;36:31-48. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxt002. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
7
Determinants of Perceived Accessibility of Maternity Leave and Childcare Leave in South Korea.韩国产妇休假和育儿假可及性感知的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 29;18(19):10286. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910286.
8
Women's labor force transitions in connection with childbirth: a panel data comparison between Germany, Sweden and Great Britain.与分娩相关的女性劳动力转型：德国、瑞典和英国的面板数据比较
J Popul Econ. 1996;9(3):223-46. doi: 10.1007/BF00176686.
9
[Political Measures against Declining Birthrate-Implication of Good Family Policies and Practice in Sweden or France].[应对出生率下降的政治措施——瑞典或法国良好家庭政策及实践的启示]
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2018;73(3):322-329. doi: 10.1265/jjh.73.322.
10
Trends in female labor force participation in Sweden.瑞典女性劳动力参与率的趋势。
J Labor Econ. 1985 Jan;3(1 Pt 2):S256-74. doi: 10.1086/298084.

引用本文的文献

1
Does having children matter? Associations between transitions in work-family role combinations and depressive symptoms among married women in Korea.生育子女有影响吗？韩国已婚女性工作-家庭角色组合转变与抑郁症状之间的关联。
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Apr 17;22:101405. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101405. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Global trends in total fertility rate and its relation to national wealth, life expectancy and female education.全球总生育率趋势及其与国家财富、预期寿命和女性教育的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):1346. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13656-1.
3
How Should the Social Service Quality Evaluation in South Korea Be Verified? Focusing on Community Care Services.韩国的社会服务质量评估应如何验证？以社区护理服务为重点。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Aug 24;8(3):294. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030294.
4
Fertility rates and the postponement of first births: a descriptive study with Finnish population data.生育率和首次生育的推迟：基于芬兰人口数据的描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 15;9(1):e026336. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026336.
5
It Doesn't End There: Workplace Bullying, Work-to-Family Conflict, and Employee Well-Being in Korea.并非到此为止：韩国的职场欺凌、工作与家庭冲突与员工福祉。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 22;15(7):1548. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071548.
6
Factors related to low birth rate among married women in Korea.韩国已婚女性低生育率相关因素。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 20;13(3):e0194597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194597. eCollection 2018.
7
Views of Japanese medical students on the work-life balance of female physicians.日本医学生对女医生工作与生活平衡的看法。
Int J Med Educ. 2017 May 11;8:165-169. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5907.0d44.

本文引用的文献

1
Family policies in OECD countries: a comparative analysis.经合组织国家的家庭政策：比较分析。
Popul Dev Rev. 2011;37(1):57-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00390.x.
2
Earner-carer model at the crossroads: reforms and outcomes of Sweden's family policy in comparative perspective.挣养家者-照顾者模式在十字路口：比较视角下瑞典家庭政策的改革与结果。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(3):373-98. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.3.a.
3
Child care availability and first-birth timing in Norway.挪威的儿童保育可及性与首次生育时间
Demography. 2007 May;44(2):345-72. doi: 10.1353/dem.2007.0017.

家庭政策如何协调生育与女性就业？韩国与瑞典的比较。

How can family policies reconcile fertility and women's employment? Comparisons between South Korea and Sweden.

作者信息

Lee Soomi, Duvander Ann-Zofie, Zarit Steven H

出版信息

Asian J Women Stud. 2016;22(3):269-288. doi: 10.1080/12259276.2016.1202027. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1080/12259276.2016.1202027
PMID:28163567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5291745/
Abstract

South Korea has extremely low rates of fertility and labor force participation by women during their childbearing years, whereas Sweden has high rates for both. Variations in family policy models may explain differences in fertility and women's employment between the two countries. Drawing upon literature that examines the effects of family policies on fertility and women's employment, this paper compares childcare support for very young children and parental leave policies in South Korea and Sweden. Thereafter, we discuss the importance of providing stronger support for dual-earner rather than single-earner families to reconcile the two objectives of increasing fertility and women's workforce participation. Specifically, it is critical to: (a) enhance the quantity and quality of childcare services for very young children, (b) achieve gender equality in parental leave policies, and

摘要

韩国育龄女性的生育率和劳动力参与率极低，而瑞典在这两方面的比率都很高。家庭政策模式的差异或许可以解释两国在生育率和女性就业方面的不同。本文借鉴了研究家庭政策对生育率和女性就业影响的文献，比较了韩国和瑞典对婴幼儿的育儿支持及育儿假政策。此后，我们讨论了为双职工家庭而非单职工家庭提供更强有力支持对于协调提高生育率和女性劳动力参与率这两个目标的重要性。具体而言，至关重要的是：(a) 提高针对婴幼儿的托儿服务的数量和质量，(b) 在育儿假政策方面实现性别平等，并且