Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Eval Health Prof. 2010 Sep;33(3):276-301. doi: 10.1177/0163278710374854.
Evidence-based therapies (EBTs) for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) are reportedly underutilized in older people. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of EBTs for the prevention of CVD events in older people and secondarily whether a Home Medicines Review (HMR) service by pharmacists' predicts the use of these medicines. A retrospective cross-sectional audit of HMR reports pertaining to 608 community-dwelling older people (>or=65 years) was conducted. EBTs considered for this audit included four guideline-recommended therapies for CVD: antithrombotic therapy (warfarin +/- antiplatelet therapy), beta-blockers, statins, and angiotensin agents (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEI] +/- angiotensin II receptor blockers [ARBs]). The prevalence of EBT use among the older people, mean age (SD) 75.6 (7.5) years, was: 73% for antithrombotic therapy, 75% for statins, 74% for angiotensin therapy, and 35% for beta-blockers. CVD risk factors warranting treatment with these EBTs were frequently associated with use of EBTs. EBTs were least likely to be used in those with coronary interventions like coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)/stent insertion (all EBTs except angiotensin agents) and angiotensin agents in those with a history of myocardial infarction or chronic heart failure. A pharmacist-led HMR service was significantly associated with the prescribing of all 4 EBTs. The results from this study show good adherence to evidence-based guidelines in general, although there is still room for improvement to further optimize clinical outcomes in these complex patients. The study also adds to the available literature on the effectiveness of pharmacists' collaborative contribution to the care of these high-risk patients.
据报道,预防心血管疾病 (CVD) 的循证治疗 (EBT) 在老年人中未得到充分利用。本研究的主要目的是评估 EBT 在预防老年人 CVD 事件中的使用情况,其次是评估药剂师的家庭药物审查 (HMR) 服务是否可以预测这些药物的使用。对涉及 608 名社区居住的老年人(>65 岁)的 HMR 报告进行了回顾性横断面审计。本审计考虑的 EBT 包括 CVD 的四项指南推荐治疗方法:抗血栓治疗(华法林 +/- 抗血小板治疗)、β 受体阻滞剂、他汀类药物和血管紧张素类药物(血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂 [ACEI] +/- 血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂 [ARB])。在这些老年人中,EBT 的使用比例为:抗血栓治疗 73%、他汀类药物 75%、血管紧张素治疗 74%、β 受体阻滞剂 35%。需要用这些 EBT 治疗的 CVD 危险因素与 EBT 的使用密切相关。接受冠状动脉旁路移植术 (CABG)/支架置入术 (除血管紧张素类药物外的所有 EBT) 的患者不太可能使用 EBT,有心肌梗死或慢性心力衰竭史的患者不太可能使用血管紧张素类药物。药剂师主导的 HMR 服务与所有 4 种 EBT 的处方显著相关。本研究结果表明,总体上对循证指南的遵循情况良好,但在这些复杂患者中进一步优化临床结局仍有改进的空间。该研究还为药剂师对这些高危患者护理的协作贡献的有效性提供了更多的文献支持。