Department of Statistics, Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Stat Med. 2010 Dec 10;29(28):2869-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.4027.
There has been substantive interest in the assessment of surrogate endpoints in medical research. These are measures that could potentially replace 'true' endpoints in clinical trials and lead to studies that require less follow-up. Recent research in the area has focused on assessments using causal inference frameworks. Beginning with a simple model for associating the surrogate and true endpoints in the population, we approach the problem as one of endogenous covariates. An instrumental variables estimator and general two-stage algorithm are proposed. Existing surrogacy frameworks are then evaluated in the context of the model. In addition, we define an extended relative effect estimator as well as a sensitivity analysis for assessing what we term the treatment instrumentality assumption. A numerical example is used to illustrate the methodology.
人们对替代终点评估在医学研究中的应用产生了浓厚的兴趣。这些替代终点是指在临床试验中可能替代“真实”终点的指标,可以减少研究所需的随访时间。该领域最近的研究集中在使用因果推理框架进行评估上。从关联人群中替代终点和真实终点的简单模型开始,我们将问题视为内源性协变量问题。我们提出了一种工具变量估计量和一般两阶段算法。然后,我们在模型的背景下评估现有的替代终点框架。此外,我们定义了一个扩展的相对效应估计量以及敏感性分析,用于评估我们所谓的治疗工具性假设。通过一个数值例子来说明该方法。