• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重复测试比重复学习产生更好的学习迁移。

Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Sep;36(5):1118-33. doi: 10.1037/a0019902.

DOI:10.1037/a0019902
PMID:20804289
Abstract

The present research investigated whether test-enhanced learning can be used to promote transfer. More specifically, 4 experiments examined how repeated testing and repeated studying affected retention and transfer of facts and concepts. Subjects studied prose passages and then either repeatedly restudied or took tests on the material. One week later, they took a final test that had either the same questions (Experiment 1a), new inferential questions within the same knowledge domain (Experiments 1b and 2), or new inferential questions from different knowledge domains (Experiment 3). Repeated testing produced superior retention and transfer on the final test relative to repeated studying. This finding indicates that the mnemonic benefits of test-enhanced learning are not limited to the retention of the specific response tested during initial learning but rather extend to the transfer of knowledge in a variety of contexts.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨测试增强型学习是否可用于促进迁移。更具体地说,4 项实验研究了重复测试和重复学习如何影响事实和概念的保持和迁移。被试学习散文段落,然后重复学习或对材料进行测试。一周后,他们参加了最终测试,测试内容包括相同的问题(实验 1a)、同一知识领域的新推理问题(实验 1b 和 2)或不同知识领域的新推理问题(实验 3)。与重复学习相比,重复测试在最终测试中产生了更好的保留和迁移效果。这一发现表明,测试增强型学习的助忆效益不仅限于保留初始学习中测试的特定反应,而是扩展到各种情境下的知识迁移。

相似文献

1
Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying.重复测试比重复学习产生更好的学习迁移。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Sep;36(5):1118-33. doi: 10.1037/a0019902.
2
Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.测试强化学习:进行记忆测试可提高长期记忆保持能力。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):249-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.
3
Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.事实学习:信息准确性、延迟及重复测试如何改变记忆保持和检索体验。
Memory. 2008 Nov;16(8):934-46. doi: 10.1080/09658210802360603.
4
When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.测试在何时增强记忆保持?基于分布的解释:检索作为一种记忆增强剂。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):801-12. doi: 10.1037/a0023219.
5
Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.元认知控制与策略选择:在学习中决定进行检索练习。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Nov;138(4):469-86. doi: 10.1037/a0017341.
6
Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing.间隔检索:绝对间隔增强学习,而与相对间隔无关。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1250-7. doi: 10.1037/a0023436.
7
Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?学生学习中的元认知策略:学生自主学习时会进行检索练习吗?
Memory. 2009 May;17(4):471-9. doi: 10.1080/09658210802647009.
8
Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.纠正元认知错误:反馈可提高低信心正确回答的记忆保持率。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jul;34(4):918-28. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918.
9
Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention.扩展检索练习可促进短期记忆,但等距检索可增强长期记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Jul;33(4):704-19. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.704.
10
Retrieval-induced facilitation: initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material.提取诱发促进效应:最初未测试的材料可以从先前对相关材料的测试中受益。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):553-71. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.553.

引用本文的文献

1
Music-evoked reactivation during continuous perception is associated with enhanced subsequent recall of naturalistic events.在持续感知过程中,音乐诱发的再激活与随后对自然主义事件的回忆增强有关。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 6:2025.07.05.663273. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.05.663273.
2
Supporting comprehension: The advantages of multiple-choice over true-false practice tests.辅助理解:多项选择题相对于是非判断题练习测试的优势。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jun 9. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01726-9.
3
Evidence for indirect strengthening through reactivation of contextually bound memories.通过重新激活上下文关联记忆实现间接强化的证据。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Apr 23;3(1):68. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00250-5.
4
How about an anatomy elective? Making a case for utilizing spaced repetition and longitudinal integration of anatomy in medical curricula.解剖学选修课怎么样?论证在医学课程中利用间隔重复和解剖学纵向整合的理由。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07021-0.
5
Effectiveness of Electronic Flashcards for Undergraduate Medical Students in Musculoskeletal Sciences.电子抽认卡对本科医学生学习肌肉骨骼科学的有效性。
Cureus. 2025 Jan 12;17(1):e77312. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77312. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Self-Testing and Follow-Through of Learning Strategies Supports Student Success.学习策略的自我测试与贯彻落实有助于学生取得成功。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Mar 1;24(1):ar16. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-04-0128.
7
Exploring pre-clinical medical students' perception of and participation in active learning: A mixed-methods transnational study.探索临床前医学生对主动学习的认知与参与情况:一项混合方法跨国研究。
Med Educ. 2025 Jun;59(6):615-629. doi: 10.1111/medu.15611. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
8
Acquiring complex concepts through classification versus observation.通过分类与观察获取复杂概念。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Dec 16;9(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00608-z.
9
Does difficulty moderate learning? A comparative analysis of the desirable difficulties framework and cognitive load theory.难度会调节学习吗?对合意困难框架和认知负荷理论的比较分析。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Dec 24;78(10):17470218241308143. doi: 10.1177/17470218241308143.
10
The role of variable retrieval in effective learning.变量检索在有效学习中的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Oct 29;121(44):e2413511121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2413511121. Epub 2024 Oct 25.