Bioinformatics & High-throughput Analysis Laboratory, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2010 Aug 16;5(8):e12203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012203.
To gauge the current commitment to scientific research in the United States of America (US), we compared federal research funding (FRF) with the US gross domestic product (GDP) and industry research spending during the past six decades. In order to address the recent globalization of scientific research, we also focused on four key indicators of research activities: research and development (R&D) funding, total science and engineering doctoral degrees, patents, and scientific publications. We compared these indicators across three major population and economic regions: the US, the European Union (EU) and the People's Republic of China (China) over the past decade. We discovered a number of interesting trends with direct relevance for science policy. The level of US FRF has varied between 0.2% and 0.6% of the GDP during the last six decades. Since the 1960s, the US FRF contribution has fallen from twice that of industrial research funding to roughly equal. Also, in the last two decades, the portion of the US government R&D spending devoted to research has increased. Although well below the US and the EU in overall funding, the current growth rate for R&D funding in China greatly exceeds that of both. Finally, the EU currently produces more science and engineering doctoral graduates and scientific publications than the US in absolute terms, but not per capita. This study's aim is to facilitate a serious discussion of key questions by the research community and federal policy makers. In particular, our results raise two questions with respect to: a) the increasing globalization of science: "What role is the US playing now, and what role will it play in the future of international science?"; and b) the ability to produce beneficial innovations for society: "How will the US continue to foster its strengths?"
为了评估美国目前在科学研究方面的投入程度,我们将联邦研究经费(FRF)与过去六十年间美国国内生产总值(GDP)和工业研究支出进行了比较。为了研究当前科学研究的全球化趋势,我们还重点关注了四项研究活动的关键指标:研发(R&D)经费、科学与工程博士学位总数、专利和科学出版物。我们在过去十年中,将这三个指标在三个主要人口和经济区域(美国、欧盟和中华人民共和国)进行了比较。我们发现了一些与科学政策直接相关的有趣趋势。在过去的六十年间,美国 FRF 占 GDP 的比例在 0.2%到 0.6%之间波动。自 20 世纪 60 年代以来,美国 FRF 的贡献从是工业研究资金的两倍下降到大致相当。此外,在过去二十年中,美国政府研发支出中用于研究的部分有所增加。尽管中国的整体资金投入远低于美国和欧盟,但中国 R&D 资金的当前增长率大大超过了美国和欧盟。最后,从绝对数量上看,欧盟目前的科学与工程博士毕业生人数和科学出版物数量都超过了美国,但人均数量则不及美国。本研究旨在为科学界和联邦政策制定者就一些关键问题进行深入讨论提供便利。特别是,我们的研究结果提出了两个问题:a)科学研究日益全球化:“美国现在在国际科学中扮演着什么角色,以及它在未来的国际科学中会扮演什么角色?”;b)为社会创造有益创新的能力:“美国将如何继续发挥其优势?”