• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国研发支出的趋势与模式。

Trends and patterns in research and development expenditures in the United States.

作者信息

Jaffe A B

机构信息

Department of Economics, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02254-9110, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):12658-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12658.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.93.23.12658
PMID:8917476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC34119/
Abstract

This paper is a review of recent trends in United States expenditures on research and development (R&D). Real expenditures by both the government and the private sector increased rapidly between the mid-1970s and the mid-1980s, and have since leveled off. This is true of both overall expenditures and expenditures on basic research, as well as funding of academic research. Preliminary estimates indicate that about $170 billion was spent on R&D in the United States in 1995, with approximately 60% of that funding coming from the private sector and about 35% from the federal government. In comparison to other countries, we have historically spent more on R&D relative to our economy than other advanced economies, but this advantage appears to be disappearing. If defense-related R&D is excluded, our expenditures relative to the size of the economy are considerably smaller than those of other similar economies.

摘要

本文回顾了美国研发支出的近期趋势。20世纪70年代中期至80年代中期,政府和私营部门的实际支出均迅速增长,此后趋于平稳。总体支出、基础研究支出以及学术研究资金均是如此。初步估计表明,1995年美国在研发上的支出约为1700亿美元,其中约60%的资金来自私营部门,约35%来自联邦政府。与其他国家相比,相对于我们的经济规模,我们在研发上的历史支出一直高于其他发达经济体,但这种优势似乎正在消失。如果排除与国防相关的研发支出,我们相对于经济规模的支出比其他类似经济体要小得多。

相似文献

1
Trends and patterns in research and development expenditures in the United States.美国研发支出的趋势与模式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):12658-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12658.
2
Worldwide trends in funding for contraceptive research and evaluation.全球范围内避孕研究与评估的资金投入趋势。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 Sep-Oct;17(5):196-207.
3
Financial anatomy of biomedical research.生物医学研究的资金剖析
JAMA. 2005 Sep 21;294(11):1333-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.11.1333.
4
Comment: Boosting research funding as uncertainty reigns.评论:在不确定性盛行之际增加研究资金。
Nature. 2017 Nov 1;551(7678):S13. doi: 10.1038/551S13a.
5
The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons.医学研究的剖析:美国与国际比较。
JAMA. 2015 Jan 13;313(2):174-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15939.
6
The future of the national laboratories.国家实验室的未来。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):12678-85. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12678.
7
Measuring science: an exploration.衡量科学:一次探索。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):12664-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12664.
8
Funding and publishing trends of original research by emergency medicine investigators over the past decade.过去十年间急诊医学研究人员原创研究的资金投入与发表趋势。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):95-101. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.004. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
9
On-again, off-again funding of academic science.学术科研资金时有时无。
Science. 1969 Jan 24;163(3865):343. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3865.343.
10
Will biomedicine outgrow support?生物医学是否会不再获得支持?
Nature. 1999 May 27;399(6734):299-301. doi: 10.1038/20538.

引用本文的文献

1
Provenance and Funding of Extremely Cited Biomedical Articles Published Between 2003 and 2024.2003年至2024年间发表的高被引生物医学文章的来源和资金资助情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Sep 5;6(9):e253045. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3045.
2
Reply to "Far away from the lamppost".回复“远离灯柱”。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Dec 11;16(12):e3000075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000075. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
The impact of the economy and recessions on the marketplace demand for ophthalmologists (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).经济及衰退对眼科医生市场需求的影响(一篇美国眼科学会论文)
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2011 Dec;109:49-65.
4
The United States of America and scientific research.美利坚合众国与科学研究。
PLoS One. 2010 Aug 16;5(8):e12203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012203.
5
DNA patents and scientific discovery and innovation: assessing benefits and risks.DNA专利与科学发现及创新:评估益处与风险
Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Jan;7(1):29-62. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0023-9.
6
Privatized biomedical research, public fears, and the hazards of government regulation: lessons from stem cell research.生物医学研究私有化、公众恐惧与政府监管的危害:干细胞研究的教训
Health Care Anal. 1999;7(3):273-87. doi: 10.1023/a:1009405027357.
7
Science, technology, and economic growth.科学、技术与经济增长。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):12655-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12655.

本文引用的文献

1
Flows of knowledge from universities and federal laboratories: modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries.来自大学和联邦实验室的知识流动:对专利引用随时间以及跨机构和地域界限的流动进行建模。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 12;93(23):12671-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12671.