Suppr超能文献

一项关于整形手术与医疗行业关系的系统综述。

A systematic review of the relationship between plastic surgery and the medical industry.

机构信息

Ann Arbor, Mich. From the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Sep;126(3):1098-1105. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e60569.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The nature and extent of medicine's relationship with the medical industry is currently a heated issue in medicine. Although the ethical implications of this relationship have been widely discussed in medical journals and the popular media, it is unknown how the current interest in industry issues has affected plastic surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to characterize the literature of the past two decades that examines plastic surgery's relationship with the medical industry.

METHODS

Three medical databases were searched using plastic surgery and industry-related search terms. The quality of selected articles was assessed by two reviewers. The specific data abstracted included the venue of the industry interaction discussed within the article: (1) physician education programs, (2) research partnerships, and (3) clinical settings. Within each of these categories, a comprehensive taxonomy was created to categorize the thematic content of the articles' discussions.

RESULTS

Of the 465 articles gleaned by the search, 21 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the final review. All 21 articles were of a review or editorial nature, and the majority (57 percent) discussed the nature or effects of industry's presence within the clinical setting.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review revealed the literature's cursory analysis of plastic surgery's relationship with the medical industry. This project highlighted the need for plastic surgery to examine the ethical implications of industry's support and engagement within the field. Improving this literature is necessary for plastic surgeons to understand and adhere to current standards on acceptable practices.

摘要

背景

医学与医疗产业的关系性质和程度目前是医学领域的一个热门话题。尽管这种关系的伦理含义在医学期刊和大众媒体上已经广泛讨论过,但目前人们对行业问题的关注如何影响整形外科学尚不清楚。本系统评价的目的是描述过去二十年中检查整形外科学与医疗产业关系的文献。

方法

使用与整形手术和产业相关的搜索词在三个医学数据库中进行搜索。两名评审员评估选定文章的质量。提取的具体数据包括文章中讨论的产业互动的场所:(1)医师教育计划、(2)研究伙伴关系和(3)临床环境。在每个类别中,创建了一个综合分类法,以对文章讨论的主题内容进行分类。

结果

通过搜索获得的 465 篇文章中,有 21 篇符合纳入和排除标准,并包含在最终的综述中。这 21 篇文章均为综述或社论性质,其中 57%(13 篇)讨论了产业在临床环境中存在的性质或影响。

结论

本系统评价揭示了文献对整形外科学与医疗产业关系的粗略分析。该项目强调了整形外科学需要检查产业支持和参与领域的伦理含义。改进这一文献对于整形外科医生了解和遵守当前可接受实践的标准是必要的。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of the relationship between plastic surgery and the medical industry.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Sep;126(3):1098-1105. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e60569.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
8
9
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of ethical principles in the plastic surgery literature.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):1711-1718. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b98a9f.
2
Department of Justice investigation of orthopaedic industry.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(7):1791-805. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00096.
3
Associations say no to industry funding.
JAMA. 2009 May 13;301(18):1865-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.608.
5
The ethics of expediency.
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 May-Jun;34(5):799-807. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.03.012.
8
Industry-sponsored clinical research: a broken system.
JAMA. 2008 Sep 3;300(9):1069-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.9.1069.
9
Everyone's a little bit biased (even physicians).
JAMA. 2008 Jun 25;299(24):2893-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.24.2893.
10
Financial support of continuing medical education.
JAMA. 2008 Mar 5;299(9):1060-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.9.1060.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验