Murray T H
Center for Biomedical Ethics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Hum Gene Ther. 1990 Spring;1(1):49-54. doi: 10.1089/hum.1990.1.1-49.
The public's involvement in the debate over human gene therapy is used to illustrate two points. First, complex bioethical issues often come to the public's attention because of a scandal, in this case the Cline episode; enlightened discussion and public understanding are difficult to achieve under these conditions. Second, even with unfavorable circumstances at the outset, the debate can become channeled into politically responsible institutions which then can develop effective public policy. For gene therapy, four significant forums emerged: the President's Commission's Report Splicing Life, the 1982 Congressional Hearings, the OTA Report, and the RAC's Points to Consider document.
公众参与关于人类基因治疗的辩论被用来说明两点。第一,复杂的生物伦理问题往往因丑闻而引起公众关注,在这种情况下是克莱恩事件;在这些条件下,很难实现开明的讨论和公众理解。第二,即使一开始情况不利,辩论也可以被引导到对政治负责的机构,然后这些机构可以制定有效的公共政策。对于基因治疗,出现了四个重要的论坛:总统委员会的报告《拼接生命》、1982年的国会听证会、技术评估办公室的报告以及重组DNA咨询委员会的《考虑要点》文件。