Suppr超能文献

从患者和临床医生的角度来看抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症中断和继续的原因。

Reasons for discontinuation and continuation of antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia from patient and clinician perspectives.

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Oct;26(10):2403-10. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.515900.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify reasons for discontinuation and continuation of antipsychotic medications in the treatment of schizophrenia from the patients' and their clinicians' perspectives.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Two measures were previously developed to assess the Reasons for Antipsychotic Discontinuation/Continuation (RAD), one from the patient's perspective and another from the clinician's perspective. These measures were administered to acutely ill schizophrenia patients enrolled in a 12-week study of antipsychotic medications (N = 596) and to their clinicians. The RAD was assessed at baseline and at endpoint. Reasons were rated on a 5-point scale from 'primary reason' to 'not a reason.' The single most important reason was also identified. The 'single most important reason' and the 'primary reasons' for discontinuing the drug used prior to enrollment, and for discontinuing or continuing the study drug were identified. Levels of concordance between patients' and clinicians' reasons were assessed.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The data source for this study is a clinical trial registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00337662).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reasons for Antipsychotic Discontinuation/Continuation (RAD).

RESULTS

Patients and clinicians identified several reasons for medication discontinuation and continuation (2.3 to 6.3 reasons, on average). The top 'single most important' reason for discontinuing the drug used prior to enrollment and for discontinuing the study drug was 'positive symptoms not sufficiently improved or made worse,' followed by 'medication-related adverse events.' The most frequent 'single most important' reason for medication continuation was 'improved positive symptoms,' followed by 'patient's perception of improvement,' and 'functional improvement.' A high level of concordance was observed between patients' and clinicians' ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

Medication efficacy appears to be the core driver of medication discontinuation and continuation, especially with regard to positive symptoms. There was a high level of concordance between patients' and clinicians' perspectives. Limitations include the study requirement that patients be at least moderately ill and experiencing acute psychotic exacerbation, a potential selection bias in the readiness to respond to measures, and small sample sizes for some analyses. Further research is needed to replicate findings in patients who are not acutely ill.

摘要

目的

从患者和临床医生的角度出发,确定治疗精神分裂症时停用和继续使用抗精神病药物的原因。

研究设计与方法

先前开发了两种措施来评估抗精神病药物停药/继续使用的原因(RAD),一种来自患者的角度,另一种来自临床医生的角度。这些措施被用于参加一项为期 12 周的抗精神病药物研究的急性精神分裂症患者(N=596)及其临床医生。RAD 在基线和终点进行评估。原因按 5 分制评分,从“主要原因”到“不是原因”。还确定了单个最重要的原因。确定了入组前停用的药物以及停用或继续使用研究药物的“单一最重要原因”和“主要原因”。评估了患者和临床医生之间原因的一致性水平。

临床试验注册

本研究的数据来源是在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册的一项临床试验(NCT00337662)。

主要观察指标

抗精神病药物停药/继续使用的原因(RAD)。

结果

患者和临床医生确定了几种药物停药和继续使用的原因(平均 2.3 至 6.3 个原因)。入组前停用的药物和停用研究药物的“单一最重要”原因是“阳性症状未得到充分改善或恶化”,其次是“药物相关不良反应”。继续用药的最常见“单一最重要”原因是“改善阳性症状”,其次是“患者对改善的感知”和“功能改善”。患者和临床医生的评分之间观察到高度一致性。

结论

药物疗效似乎是停药和继续用药的核心驱动因素,尤其是对阳性症状。患者和临床医生的观点之间存在高度一致性。局限性包括研究要求患者至少处于中度疾病状态并经历急性精神病恶化,对措施的反应有潜在的选择偏差,以及某些分析的样本量较小。需要进一步研究在非急性疾病患者中复制这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验