Blosser Christopher D, Ayehu Gashu, Wu Sam, Lomagro Ruth M, Malone Ellen, Brunelli Steven M, Itkin Max, Golden Michael, McCombs Peter, Lipschutz Joshua H
Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hemodial Int. 2010 Oct;14(4):393-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2010.00479.x. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are considered superior to arteriovenous grafts and catheters. Nevertheless, AVF prevalence in the United States remains under the established target. The complication rates and financial cost of vascular access continue to rise and disproportionately contribute to the burgeoning health care costs. The relationship between financial incentives for a type of vascular access and rate of access placement is unclear. All chronic hemodialysis patients (n=99) receiving care at Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center as of August 1, 2008 were participants. Demographic characteristics, vascular access type, and nonrelative value unit compensation were assessed as predictors, and the vascular access prevalence rate, operative times, and frequency of access interventions were analyzed. A 73.7% AVF rate was achieved in this cohort of patients with 51.5% diabetes mellitus. The number of access procedures per patient per year remained constant over time. The Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, a single payer system, achieved superior AVF prevalence and exceeded the national AVF target. Financial incentives for arteriovenous graft placement currently exist in the United States, as there is similar Medicare reimbursement for arteriovenous graft and basilic vein transposition, despite longer operative times for basilic vein transpositions. The high AVF prevalence at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center may be due to the VA nonrelative value unit-driven system that allows for interdisciplinary care, priority of AVFs, and frequent use of basilic vein transposition surgery, when appropriate. We have identified an important, hypothesis-generating example of a nonrelative value unit-based approach to vascular access yielding superior results with respect to patient care and cost.
动静脉内瘘(AVF)被认为优于动静脉移植物和导管。然而,美国动静脉内瘘的普及率仍低于既定目标。血管通路的并发症发生率和财务成本持续上升,且在不断膨胀的医疗保健成本中占比过高。一种血管通路的经济激励措施与通路置入率之间的关系尚不清楚。截至2008年8月1日在费城退伍军人事务医疗中心接受治疗的所有慢性血液透析患者(n = 99)均为参与者。评估人口统计学特征、血管通路类型和非相对价值单位补偿作为预测因素,并分析血管通路普及率、手术时间和通路干预频率。在这个糖尿病患病率为51.5%的患者队列中,动静脉内瘘率达到了73.7%。每位患者每年的通路手术数量随时间保持不变。费城退伍军人事务医疗中心作为一个单一支付系统,实现了较高的动静脉内瘘普及率,并超过了国家动静脉内瘘目标。目前美国存在对动静脉移植物置入的经济激励措施,因为尽管贵要静脉转位手术时间更长,但动静脉移植物和贵要静脉转位在医疗保险报销方面相似。费城退伍军人事务医疗中心较高的动静脉内瘘普及率可能归因于退伍军人事务部基于非相对价值单位的系统,该系统允许跨学科护理、优先考虑动静脉内瘘,并在适当的时候频繁使用贵要静脉转位手术。我们已经确定了一个基于非相对价值单位的血管通路方法的重要且能产生假设的例子,该方法在患者护理和成本方面产生了更好的结果。