Suppr超能文献

足底压力鞋垫:跑步中力量和压力测量的准确性和可靠性。

Footscan pressure insoles: accuracy and reliability of force and pressure measurements in running.

机构信息

University of Exeter, School of Sports and Health Sciences, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2010 Oct;32(4):664-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.08.002.

Abstract

In the current investigation, the accuracy and reliability of two pairs of Footscan pressure insoles (500 Hz, RSscan, Belgium) was assessed, with four female (pair 1) and four male (pair 2) participants each performing 16 running trials (3.8m/s ± 5%). Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) revealed that the reliability of the force and pressure data was generally excellent (ICC>0.75). In comparison with impact and propulsive force data collected simultaneously with a force plate (AMTI, 500 Hz), insole data were significantly lower (p<0.05). Therefore, despite the excellent reliability of measurements, the accuracy of the impact and propulsive forces taken with the Footscan pressure insole is low. It is concluded that data collected without appropriate calibration should be used with caution, particularly if the aim is to use the data for a comparison of absolute force and pressure magnitudes with criterion values.

摘要

在当前的研究中,评估了两对 Footscan 压力鞋垫(500Hz,RSscan,比利时)的准确性和可靠性,每对有四名女性(第 1 对)和四名男性(第 2 对)参与者,每个参与者进行 16 次跑步试验(3.8m/s±5%)。组内相关系数(ICC)显示,力和压力数据的可靠性通常非常好(ICC>0.75)。与同时使用测力板(AMTI,500Hz)收集的冲击和推进力数据相比,鞋垫数据明显较低(p<0.05)。因此,尽管测量的可靠性很高,但 Footscan 压力鞋垫测量的冲击和推进力的准确性较低。结论是,在没有适当校准的情况下收集的数据应谨慎使用,特别是如果目的是使用数据将绝对力和压力与标准值进行比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验