Suppr超能文献

体质量指数为 40 或更高的剖宫产切口缝合与订书钉缝合的比较:一项随机临床试验。

Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ.

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, MEDNAX Medical Group, Mesa, AZ.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jan;3(1):100271. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100271. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery is the most common major surgical procedure performed in the United States. Women with class III obesity have an increased risk of cesarean delivery and have wound complication rates higher than healthy body mass index counterparts. Available evidence regarding optimal wound closure is lacking specific to the population of women with class III obesity despite a known increased rate of wound complications.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare rates of postoperative wound complications among women with class III obesity (body mass index of ≥40 kg/m) undergoing cesarean delivery with skin closure by either subcuticular suture or surgical staples.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients were randomly assigned to skin closure by nonabsorbable stainless steel surgical staples or subcuticular suture of the surgeon's choice at the time of cesarean delivery at 2 university hospitals. Randomization was stratified for scheduled vs unscheduled cesarean delivery and for the 2 study sites. The primary outcome was the rate of any documented wound complication during the first 6 weeks after delivery. Any predictors of the composite outcome that in univariate analysis had a P<.20 were entered into a forward logistic regression. Sample size was calculated based on published literature and estimating the rate of wound complications within 6 weeks of follow-up at 20% with staples and 10% with sutures. For a power of 0.80 with a 2-tailed of 0.05, a total of 199 participants per group were required.

RESULTS

From September 2015 to May 2019, 232 women were randomized to staples (n=117) or sutures (n=115). Nearing the planned interim analysis, enrollment in the study was concluded administratively owing to low enrollment. With loss to follow-up and exclusions, a total of 90 women were analyzed in each group. In the suture group, one-third was closed with braided suture and two-thirds were closed with monofilament suture. Median staple removal was 5 days postoperatively. Fewer composite wound complications were noted in the surgical staples group than the subcuticular suture group (20.0% vs 27.6%), although this difference was not statistically significant (P≥.5). The rate of surgical site infection was significantly lower in the staples group (10.5% vs 22.7%; P=.041). In the multiple logistic regression, the 3 significant independent predictors of the outcome were body mass index (odds ratio, 1.08; P=.004), scheduled vs unscheduled cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 0.40; P=.018), and study site (odds ratio, 0.36; P=.028).

CONCLUSION

Surgical staples or subcuticular suture for skin closure at the time of cesarean delivery in women with a body mass index of ≥40 kg/m resulted in similar composite wound complication rates; however, lower cesarean wound infection rates were noted among wounds closed with staples.

摘要

背景

剖宫产是美国最常见的主要外科手术。III 类肥胖的女性行剖宫产的风险增加,且与健康体重指数相比,其切口并发症发生率更高。尽管已知 III 类肥胖女性的切口并发症发生率较高,但目前仍缺乏针对该人群的最佳切口缝合方法的具体证据。

目的

本研究旨在比较 III 类肥胖(体重指数≥40kg/m)女性行剖宫产时采用皮下缝合线或不锈钢不可吸收缝线缝合皮肤的术后切口并发症发生率。

研究设计

在 2 所大学医院,对计划行剖宫产的患者于术前进行随机分组,采用非吸收性不锈钢缝线缝合或皮下缝合线缝合,缝线由术者选择。随机分组根据计划剖宫产与非计划剖宫产以及 2 个研究地点进行分层。主要结局为产后 6 周内任何有记录的切口并发症发生率。对单因素分析中 P<.20 的任何预测复合结局的因素进行正向逻辑回归分析。根据已发表的文献和估计 6 周随访期间缝线组 20%和缝合组 10%的切口并发症发生率计算样本量。为了达到 80%的功效和双侧 0.05 的显著性水平,每组需要 199 名参与者。

结果

2015 年 9 月至 2019 年 5 月,232 名女性被随机分为缝线组(n=117)或缝线组(n=115)。由于入组人数较少,在计划进行中期分析时,研究的入组工作已由行政部门终止。经过失访和排除,每组各有 90 名女性进行了分析。在缝线组中,三分之一的切口采用编织缝线缝合,三分之二的切口采用单股缝线缝合。缝线的中位去除时间为术后 5 天。缝线组的复合切口并发症发生率低于皮下缝合组(20.0% vs 27.6%),尽管差异无统计学意义(P≥.5)。缝线组的手术部位感染发生率显著低于皮下缝合组(10.5% vs 22.7%;P=.041)。在多元逻辑回归中,3 个独立的预测切口并发症的显著因素是体重指数(比值比,1.08;P=.004)、计划剖宫产与非计划剖宫产(比值比,0.40;P=.018)和研究地点(比值比,0.36;P=.028)。

结论

对于 BMI≥40kg/m 的女性,剖宫产时采用缝线或皮下缝合皮肤,其复合切口并发症发生率相似;但采用缝线缝合的切口,其剖宫产切口感染发生率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验